Where is the veiled chameleon legal?

Chamaeleo calyptratus. Restricted in 5 of the 52 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Interactive map

Alabama: no restriction found for veiled chameleonAlaska: no restriction found for veiled chameleonArizona: no restriction found for veiled chameleonArkansas: no restriction found for veiled chameleonCalifornia: no restriction found for veiled chameleonColorado: no restriction found for veiled chameleonConnecticut: no restriction found for veiled chameleonDelaware: no restriction found for veiled chameleonFlorida: no restriction found for veiled chameleonGeorgia: no restriction found for veiled chameleonHawaii: banned for veiled chameleonIdaho: no restriction found for veiled chameleonIllinois: no restriction found for veiled chameleonIndiana: no restriction found for veiled chameleonIowa: no restriction found for veiled chameleonKansas: no restriction found for veiled chameleonKentucky: no restriction found for veiled chameleonLouisiana: no restriction found for veiled chameleonMaine: no restriction found for veiled chameleonMaryland: no restriction found for veiled chameleonMassachusetts: no restriction found for veiled chameleonMichigan: no restriction found for veiled chameleonMinnesota: conditions apply for veiled chameleonMississippi: no restriction found for veiled chameleonMissouri: no restriction found for veiled chameleonMontana: no restriction found for veiled chameleonNebraska: no restriction found for veiled chameleonNevada: no restriction found for veiled chameleonNew Hampshire: no restriction found for veiled chameleonNew Jersey: permit required for veiled chameleonNew Mexico: no restriction found for veiled chameleonNew York: no restriction found for veiled chameleonNorth Carolina: no restriction found for veiled chameleonNorth Dakota: no restriction found for veiled chameleonOhio: no restriction found for veiled chameleonOklahoma: no restriction found for veiled chameleonOregon: no restriction found for veiled chameleonPennsylvania: no restriction found for veiled chameleonRhode Island: no restriction found for veiled chameleonSouth Carolina: no restriction found for veiled chameleonSouth Dakota: no restriction found for veiled chameleonTennessee: no restriction found for veiled chameleonTexas: no restriction found for veiled chameleonUtah: no restriction found for veiled chameleonVermont: no restriction found for veiled chameleonVirginia: no restriction found for veiled chameleonWashington: no restriction found for veiled chameleonWest Virginia: permit required for veiled chameleonWisconsin: no restriction found for veiled chameleonWyoming: no restriction found for veiled chameleonDistrict of Columbia: banned for veiled chameleon

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked.

What the colours mean

  • Banned (2)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit required (2)Legal, but you need a permit or license before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions apply (1)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • UnclearThe rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction found (47)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
  • Not checked yetWe have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.

Every restriction on the veiled chameleon

5 of the 52 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.

District of Columbia

Banned§ 8-1808(j)(1)(E)
Non-venomous snakes, fish, and turtles

Lizards are absent from the permitted list entirely.

How this rule works: A closed list and one of the shortest in the country. Subsection (j)(1) bars importing, possessing, displaying, selling, trading or giving as a household pet "any living member of the animal kingdom, including those born or raised in captivity", except seven categories: domestic dogs, domestic cats, domesticated rodents and rabbits, captive-bred common cage birds, non-venomous snakes and fish and turtles, ferrets, and racing pigeons. No lizard, no amphibian and no invertebrate fits any of them. Read from the D.C. Code rather than from a reproduction: the seven categories and their exact wording are what every cell in this jurisdiction turns on.

D.C. Code § 8-1808(j), Prohibited conduct →

Hawaii

Banned§ 4-71-6
The introduction into Hawaii of live animals or live non-domestic animals as defined in this chapter at any stage of development is prohibited except for those animals on the lists

Chamaeleo calyptratus appears on no Hawaii list. The only chameleons named anywhere are Chamaeleo chamaeleon and Furcifer oustaleti, both on the restricted list for research and exhibition only. Veiled chameleons are established in the wild on Maui and Oahu, which is exactly the outcome the default rule exists to prevent.

How this rule works: Also carries the default rule: introduction is 'prohibited except for those animals on the lists' incorporated in § 4-71-6.5.

Hawaii Administrative Rules § 4-71-6, List of Prohibited Animals →

New Jersey

Permit requiredN.J.A.C. 7:25-4.5
A permit shall be required for any other exotic mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians, or nongame species not specifically exempted by N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.4.

New Jersey is a closed-list state in the strict sense. 7:25-4.2(a) bars possession of any exotic or nongame species without a permit, 4.4 then names the handful that may be kept without one, and 4.5 sweeps everything else back in. The veiled chameleon appears on none of the Division's three lists, so it is not exempt under 4.4, not one of the families singled out in 4.3, and not potentially dangerous under 4.8. That leaves 4.5, and the permit it points to is the individual hobby permit at 4.6(a)1, which 4.7 conditions on diet, caging that prevents escape, lawful acquisition, veterinary care and freedom from disease. The Division's own handout tells readers to phone the permits office for anything the lists do not name, which is a fair signal that the catch-all is where these end up rather than an oversight. Chamaeleonidae is absent from 4.3, which does reach a long run of lizard families, so the chameleons are one of the groups that only 4.5 answers.

How this rule works: NJDEP's own courtesy copy of the whole of N.J.A.C. 7:25. Subchapter 4 starts at 7:25-4.1 and carries the definitions, the permit requirement at 4.2, the three species lists at 4.3, 4.4 and 4.8, the pet bar at 4.9(a)3 and 4.15(b), and the state endangered list at 4.13. The three list PDFs the Division hands out are extracts of this.

N.J.A.C. 7:25 Subchapter 4, Endangered, Nongame and Exotic Wildlife →

West Virginia

Permit requiredW. Va. Code § 20-2-13; § 20-1-2; § 20-2-4(a), (b)
No person shall transport into or have in his possession within this state any live wildlife or viable eggs thereof from without the state, except as authorized by an importation permit issued by the director

West Virginia’s importation section is the rule the rest of this column was written without, and it changes the answer for every exotic reptile and amphibian in it. W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 builds wildlife out of wild birds, wild animals, game and fur-bearing animals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, mollusks, crustaceans and all forms of aquatic life used as fish bait. The reptile and amphibian clause carries no nativity qualifier and no captive-bred carve-out, so a pet reptile or amphibian bought from an out-of-state breeder is live wildlife from without the state. A veiled chameleon is a reptile and a Yemeni and Saudi species, so it is wildlife from without the state on any route into West Virginia. § 20-2-13 then bars both bringing that animal in and having it in possession within the state except under an importation permit from the director, and the permit is discretionary: the director may issue it, fix its terms and revoke it at his pleasure. How firm this is, both ways. § 20-2-4(a) independently makes it unlawful to take, obtain, purchase, possess or maintain in captivity any live wildlife except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-4(b) says wildlife lawfully taken outside of this state is subject to the same laws and rules as wildlife taken within it, which closes the argument that an out-of-state origin puts the animal outside the chapter before it is made. Against that, the section is headed importation and certification and the body of it is disease control, fish pathologist certificates and inspection of imported shipments, with the only penalty clause written for coyotes. Nothing in Title 58 implements § 20-2-13 for anything but aquaculture, and WVDNR publishes no application for an importation permit. So this is a statutory permit requirement that is real on paper with its machinery not visibly in place, which is the same shape as the Minnesota breeder condition and is recorded the same way. Neither of West Virginia’s two species lists bars this animal. W. Va. C.S.R. § 74-1-3, the dangerous wild animal list adopted 5 April 2022, is a mammal list plus the Komodo dragon. W. Va. C.S.R. § 58-73 reaches native West Virginia reptiles and amphibians only.

How this rule works: West Virginia splits its animals by two definitions in one section. Wildlife takes in reptiles, amphibians, mollusks and crustaceans with no nativity limit and no terrestrial arthropod at all. Wild animals means all mammals native to the State of West Virginia, which is the phrase that decides every mammal here. § 20-2-4 bars possessing either except as the chapter or a rule provides, and § 20-2-51 is the only pet route, a two dollar permit from the director.

W. Va. Code § 20-1-2 (definitions), § 20-2-4 (possession of wildlife), § 20-2-13 (importation) and § 20-2-51 (permit for keeping pets) →

Minnesota

Conditions apply§ 97A.401, subd. 8
The commissioner must prescribe conditions and may issue permits to breed, propagate, and sell snakes, lizards, and salamanders. A snake, lizard, or salamander that is obtained from a permitted breeder or that was possessed before August 1, 2021, may be possessed as a pet.

Minnesota gets here in three steps, and the surprise is that none of them turns on the species being native. Section 97A.015, subd. 55 defines wild animals as creatures wild by nature and includes reptiles, with no geographic limit. Subd. 39 makes snakes, lizards and salamanders protected wild animals as whole categories. Section 97A.501, subd. 1 then bars possessing a protected wild animal unless the game and fish laws allow it, and this subdivision is the allowance. A veiled chameleon is a lizard, so the breeder-source condition applies to it as much as to a Minnesota native. Two things to know about how firm this is. The statute says the commissioner "must" prescribe conditions, but there is no snake, lizard or salamander breeder permit on the DNR's permits page, Minnesota Rules chapter 6256 covers only frogs and turtles, and no rule chapter implements the subdivision. And the DNR's own pet-trade page describes the change as reaching "wild collected Minnesota snakes, lizards, and/or salamanders", which is narrower than the statute's words and does not mention the breeder permit at all. So the condition is real on paper and its machinery is not visibly in place.

How this rule works: Subd. 8, added in 2021, is the pet reptile rule: the commissioner must prescribe conditions and may issue breeder permits, and a snake, lizard or salamander is possessable as a pet if it came from a permitted breeder or was held before 1 August 2021. Subd. 3 is the older, broader route, allowing special permits without a fee to possess wild animals as pets.

Minn. Stat. § 97A.401, Special permits →

For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the veiled chameleon legal guide.

Past the legal question? See the veiled chameleon profile.

Cite this page

Every entry here is quoted from the statute or regulation it comes from, with the date it was last read against the published text.

How to read this

Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat grey state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.

Even a flat grey is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.