Where is the raccoon legal?
Procyon lotor. Restricted in 51 of the 52 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.
Interactive map
How to use this page
- Click or tap any state to see the rule behind its colour, the citation, and a link to the regulation itself. Tap it again to clear it. By keyboard, tab to a state and press Enter or space.
- The answer appears directly under the map on a phone, and in the panel beside it on a wider screen. Alaska, Hawaii and DC sit out of position so they stay clickable. City rules, New York City among them, cannot be shaded on a state map at all and are in the list below.
- Every restriction is written out below the map, one row per state. Open a row for the wording of the rule. That list is the same information as the map, in a form you can search with find-on-page.
- The chips at the foot of the page switch animals, grouped by kind and A to Z within each group. The map, the list and the counts all follow whichever one is selected.
- On the colours: flat gray was read and had no rule, dotted was never read for this animal, and hatched means the rule does not resolve either way. The first two are easy to confuse and mean very different things.
Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked. The counts include New York City, which has rules separate from the surrounding state and so cannot be shaded on a state map. Listed in full below.
What the colours mean
- Banned (26)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
- Permit required (18)Legal, but you need a permit or license before the animal arrives.
- Conditions apply (4)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
- Unclear (3)The rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
- No restriction found (1)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
- Not checked yetWe have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.
Choose an animal (82 of them)
Reptiles
Amphibians
Small mammals
Larger mammals
Every restriction on the raccoon
51 of the 52 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.
Alabama
Banned§ (1), (3)
Any of the following from any area outside the state of Alabama; any member of the family Cervidae (to include but not be limited to deer, elk, moose, caribou), species of coyote, species of fox, species of raccoon, species of skunk, wild rodent, or strain of wild turkey, black bear (Ursus americanus), mountain lion (Felis concolor), bobcat (Felis rufus)
"Species of raccoon" from outside Alabama is barred, and the rule also forbids transporting a listed animal within the state whatever its origin, except by a licensed game breeder under Code § 9-11-31. A raccoon from inside the state is a protected wild animal, which § (3) bars possessing alive except under a permit issued before that amendment. The game breeder license is a propagation license, not a pet one.
How this rule works: Alabama's prohibited list, not a permitted one, so absence from it means an animal is unrestricted. The official code site is a React app that serves nothing to a fetcher, but /api/rule/<number> returns the current rule as a PDF; use it, because Cornell LII's copy is the 2020 version and the current one differs. Two clauses do most of the work: everything the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists as injurious wildlife under the Lacey Act is banned by reference, and a block of mammals is banned when it comes from outside Alabama.
Ala. Admin. Code r. 220-2-.26, Restrictions On Possession, Sale, Importation And/Or Release Of Certain Animals And Fish →Alaska
Banned§ 92.029(a), (c); AS 16.05.940(19)
The department may not issue a permit for the capture, possession, import, or export of any game animal, including a hybrid of a game animal and a species listed in (b) of this section, for use as a pet
Game in Alaska is "any species of bird, reptile, and mammal" found or introduced in the state, so nativity does not matter. The raccoon is not on the § 92.029(b) clean list, and subsection (c) bars any permit for keeping game as a pet.
How this rule works: The strictest structure in the country and the clearest. Subsection (a) bars possessing live game without a permit, (b) is a short clean list of species needing no permit, and (c) then removes the escape hatch: the department may not issue a permit for any game animal for use as a pet. So an animal missing from the clean list cannot be kept, permit or not.
5 AAC 92.029, Permit for possessing live game →California
Banned§ 671(c)(2)(K)(4)
Family Procyonidae-All species-(D)
The whole procyonid family is restricted, marked (D) as detrimental, and the four exceptions written under it (the two pandas, the ringtail and the cacomistle) are only moved to the welfare category, not freed. The raccoon is also a native California animal, but § 671 reaches any live animal of a listed family whatever its origin, and the only route for a native one is the Native Species Exhibiting permit for unreleasable rehabilitation animals. No permit type covers pet keeping, so it is a ban.
How this rule works: § 671(b) defines (D) detrimental and (W) welfare. § 671.1(a) lists permit types; none covers pet keeping. The only possession permit, Animal Care, requires lawful possession in California before January 1992.
California Code of Regulations Title 14 § 671, via CDFW Restricted Species Laws and Regulations Manual →Colorado
BannedChapter W-0, § 008(B)(6)
B. The following terrestrial wildlife species or viable gametes (eggs and sperm) are hereby determined to be detrimental to existing wildlife and their habitat in Colorado, and except as authorized in writing by the Division after consideration of the criteria in Commission Regulation #1102(A)(4), their possession is prohibited. Persons who have proof of possession of those species listed in subsections 1 through 8 of this section prior to September 1, 1990, may possess the following species for the life of the animal(s). ... 6. Raccoon.
Named on Colorado's prohibited list, which CPW's mammal list confirms row by row for Procyon lotor. This is a harder answer than the regulated tier: the possession itself is prohibited, and CPW's possession page uses the raccoon as its example of an animal not allowed here even where another state permits it. It is a Colorado native as well, and C.R.S. 33-6-109 bars keeping native wildlife taken from the wild.
Existing owners: Proof of possession before 1 September 1990 allows the animal to be kept for its life, tagged and reported, but not sold, traded or moved within Colorado.
How this rule works: The Commission's prohibited species list. Nineteen entries, and the grandfather clause in the opening paragraph reaches only subsections 1 through 8, so the later additions, monk parakeet and prairie dogs among them, have no route for existing owners.
Colorado 2 CCR 406-0, Chapter W-0, § 008(B), Possession of Terrestrial Wildlife →Connecticut
Banned§ 26-55-6(a)(3)(B)(xxi), (b)(3)
(xxi) A member within the family Procyonidae (including, but not limited to, common raccoon),
The common raccoon is the example the rule gives for the whole procyonid family in Category Two. It is a Connecticut native, but Category Three, the natives tier that bars only import and export, applies only to an animal that is not already in Category One or Two. Subsection (b)(3) allows a Category Two animal only to a treating veterinarian, a municipal park, zoo, marine mammal park, aquarium, nature center, museum, exhibitor, laboratory or research facility, so there is no private route.
How this rule works: Connecticut's official eRegulations text, served as a PDF. This is the operative rule for every animal on this map, and it sorts wild animals into four categories. Category One (four mammal families) and Category Two (a long specific list) may be possessed only by institutions; Category Three, which is Connecticut's own native species, bars import and export but not possession; Category Four, the state endangered, threatened and special concern species, needs a permit. An animal in none of the four is not restricted by this section. The definitions in subsection (a) do more work than the lists: 'wild animal' reaches invertebrates, and 'domestic animal' is defined in a way that takes the pet rabbit and the ferret out of the scheme entirely.
Regs. Conn. State Agencies § 26-55-6, Importation, possession or liberation of wild birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and invertebrates →Delaware
BannedDel. Code tit. 7 § 795
No live skunks or raccoons shall be sold or possessed in this State or transported into this State for any purpose without a permit from the Division.
The raccoon is a Delaware native, so it belongs to DNREC rather than to the Agriculture exotic animal permit. § 795 requires a Division permit to possess one for any purpose, and DNREC says state regulations forbid owning native wildlife, the exception being permitted rehabilitators. The permit exists in the statute and is not issued for a pet.
How this rule works: The DNREC statute that answers Delaware's native carnivores, which the Agriculture exotic animal chapter never reaches. § 789 bars selling, buying or possessing a live red fox, except at a State or local government animal exhibition; § 791 lets a holder of five or more foxhounds raise wild whelps under permit and release them by 15 August; § 795 bars selling or possessing a live skunk or raccoon "for any purpose without a permit from the Division".
Del. Code tit. 7, ch. 7, subchapter VI, §§ 789, 791 and 795, live red foxes, skunks and raccoons →District of Columbia
Banned§ 8-1808(j)
a person shall not import into the District, possess, display, offer for sale, trade, barter, exchange, or adoption, or give as a household pet, any living member of the animal kingdom, including those born or raised in captivity, except the following
None of the seven permitted categories covers a raccoon, and the District bans by omission from a closed list, including animals "born or raised in captivity". The exceptions in (j)(2) to (j)(4) reach zoos, federally licensed exhibitors and rehabilitators, not keepers.
How this rule works: A closed list and one of the shortest in the country. Subsection (j)(1) bars importing, possessing, displaying, selling, trading or giving as a household pet "any living member of the animal kingdom, including those born or raised in captivity", except seven categories: domestic dogs, domestic cats, domesticated rodents and rabbits, captive-bred common cage birds, non-venomous snakes and fish and turtles, ferrets, and racing pigeons. No lizard, no amphibian and no invertebrate fits any of them. Read from the D.C. Code rather than from a reproduction: the seven categories and their exact wording are what every cell in this jurisdiction turns on.
D.C. Code § 8-1808(j), Prohibited conduct →Georgia
BannedDNR Guide to Legal Pets; R. 391-4-8-.05(1)(a)3; O.C.G.A. § 27-5-4(b)(1)
The following list of species native to Georgia may not be held as a pet regardless of its origin or morphology.
The raccoon is on DNR's list of natives that may not be held as a pet, and the phrase "regardless of its origin" takes in a captive-bred animal from another state. It is also caught a second time by the license rule, which reaches all of Order Carnivora, and § 27-5-4(b)(1) issues those licenses only to the animal trade and to public exhibitors. No pet route exists either way.
How this rule works: The agency page that answers the native half of Georgia, which the wild animal rule does not reach. It states the operative rule in one line, "By Georgia Law, most native species of wildlife cannot be held without permits or licenses. These licenses are not issued for the purpose of holding native wildlife as pets", and adds the sentence that closes the captive-bred argument: "These restrictions apply to the various species of animal, regardless of the origin or morphology." It then lists native species that may not be held as a pet, among them the corn snake, milksnake, garter snake, green anole, both hognose snakes, all four box turtles and the flying squirrel. Two limits are worth carrying: the list says of itself that it "does not include all native wildlife that is prohibited", and a separate paragraph names the natives Georgia does allow to be taken, "rats, mice, armadillos, coyotes, groundhogs, beaver, freshwater turtles, venomous snakes, frogs, spring lizards, fiddler crabs, freshwater crayfish, freshwater mussels, and nutria".
Georgia DNR Law Enforcement Division, Guide to Legal Pets →Hawaii
Banned§ 4-71-6.5, Restricted Animal List Part A
FAMILY Procyonidae ... Procyon lotor racoon
Named by binomial on Part A, the research and exhibition list. Part A animals come in only to a university or a licensed exhibitor under permit and may not be kept as pets.
How this rule works: Part A animals may be brought in by a university or a licensed exhibitor under permit and may not be kept as pets. Part B, published separately as AR-71RB, is the private and commercial use list and was checked as well: it runs to hoofed stock, giraffes, otters, seals, macropods and three named parrots, and contains none of the animals in this dataset.
Hawaii Administrative Rules § 4-71-6.5, List of Restricted Animals, Part A (research and exhibition) →Idaho
BannedIdaho Code § 25-236(1), (3)
No person shall possess, offer for sale, trade, barter, exchange or importation into the state of Idaho any fox, skunk or raccoon, except as provided in subsection (2) or (3) of this section.
Idaho bans the raccoon by statute. Fish and Game's rule even points at it, saying the Department of Agriculture may restrict the possession of "fox, skunk, raccoon" under § 25-236. The raccoon is also predatory wildlife under Idaho Code § 36-201. The only exceptions are fur farms holding domestic fur-bearing animals and public parks, zoos, museums and educational institutions with an Agriculture permit, so there is no pet route.
How this rule works: An Agriculture statute that bars anyone from possessing, selling, trading or importing "any fox, skunk or raccoon", with two exceptions: fur farms holding domestic fur-bearing animals, and public parks, zoos, museums and educational institutions with an Agriculture permit. There is no pet exception and no species limit on "any fox". IDAPA 13.01.10.200.07(a) cross-references it.
Idaho Code § 25-236, Possession, sale, trade, barter, exchange and importation of animals →Kentucky
Banned301 KAR 2:081 § 6(1)
(1) Except as established in Sections 2(7) and 7 of this administrative regulation, 301 KAR 2:075, and 301 KAR 3:120, a person shall not import, transport into Kentucky, or possess: ... (j) Rabies Vector Species: 1. Coyote (Canis latrans); 2. Gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus); 3. Raccoon (Procyon lotor); 4. Red fox (Vulpes vulpes); 5. Spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius); 6. Striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis); or 7. Any hybrid of rabies vector species.
The raccoon is named as a rabies vector species on Kentucky's prohibited natives list, so no permit route exists. § 1(3) defines native wildlife "regardless of ... being captive-bred or taken from the wild", so a captive-bred animal from another state is in the same position. KRS 65.877 lets local governments go further.
How this rule works: The companion to 2:082 and the rule that reaches any Kentucky native. § 1(3) defines native wildlife as species that have historically existed, currently exist or have naturally expanded their range into Kentucky, "regardless of ... origin or location of an individual animal" and of "being captive-bred or taken from the wild", so captive breeding is no exit. § 2(3) then requires a captive wildlife permit before acquiring one, with a five-per-species free allowance for native reptiles and amphibians at § 2(5) and nothing comparable for mammals. § 3(2) is the noncommercial permit, § 4 the transportation permit, § 6 the prohibited natives.
301 KAR 2:081, Transportation and holding of live native wildlife →Maine
Banned§ 7.06(4)
Unclassified Species: A person may not possess any species that has not been categorized. Any species which has not been identified as a Prohibited, Restricted, or Unrestricted species will not be eligible for a permit under this chapter, however a request may be made to review the categorization of a species subject to section 7.06(5).
Procyon lotor is in none of Maine's four buckets. The only procyonids chapter 7 names are the kinkajou in Category 1 and three coatis in Category 2, Procyonidae is not among the Category 1 families, and the Unrestricted List's carnivore section is the domestic ferret alone. So § 7.06(4) bars it and says it is not eligible for a permit. The raccoon is also a Maine native, the wild-take exemption at 12 M.R.S. § 12152(1-B) covers only reptiles, amphibians and invertebrates, and § 7.11(3)(A) would bar a native from the Category 2 permit even if it were listed there.
How this rule works: Maine is a closed-list state and § 7.06(4) is the sentence that makes it one: "A person may not possess any species that has not been categorized", and an uncategorized species "will not be eligible for a permit under this chapter". The four categories are the Unrestricted List, the Prohibited list at § 7.18(1), and Restricted Categories 1 and 2. Category 1 permits go only to exhibitors, rehabilitators, USDA-registered laboratories and accredited research facilities, so it is not a pet tier; Category 2 is open to "an individual with demonstrated experience". § 7.05 and § 7.06(5) are the route for getting an unlisted species classified.
09-137 CMR ch. 7, Rules for Importation, Possession, Propagation, Rehabilitation, and Exhibition of Wildlife →Maryland
BannedCrim. Law § 10-621(b)(1)(i)
A person may not import into the State, offer for sale, trade, barter, possess, breed, or exchange a live: (i) fox, skunk, raccoon, or bear; (ii) caiman, alligator, or crocodile; (iii) member of the cat family other than the domestic cat; (iv) hybrid of a member of the cat family and a domestic cat if the hybrid weighs over 30 pounds; (v) member of the dog family other than the domestic dog; (vi) hybrid of a member of the dog family and a domestic dog; (vii) nonhuman primate ...; or (viii) poisonous snake in the family groups of Hydrophidae, Elapidae, Viperidae, or Crotolidae.
Named in the first clause, the rabies vector clause, with the fox, the skunk and the bear. The raccoon is also native, which would bring the § 10-902 permit on top, but the criminal bar comes first. There is no private permit: the exemptions run to zoos, sanctuaries, research and licensed exhibitors. Subsection (e) preserves stricter county and municipal rules.
Existing owners: Lawful possession on or before 31 May 2006 may continue, but only if the keeper gave written notification to the local animal control authority by 1 August 2006, with the number and type of animals and a photograph or a description of a tattoo or microchip. That window is long closed.
How this rule works: Maryland's dangerous animal list, on the General Assembly's own site. Eight clauses and nothing else: fox, skunk, raccoon or bear; caiman, alligator or crocodile; any cat other than the domestic cat; a cat hybrid over 30 pounds; any dog other than the domestic dog and any dog hybrid; non-human primates; and venomous snakes of four named families. A misdemeanor, and subsection (e) says in terms that counties and municipalities may go further. Note COMAR 15.11.16.01, titled List of Prohibited Animals, is an agriculture rule about feral swine and is not this provision.
Md. Code, Criminal Law § 10-621, Importing, selling or possessing certain animals →Mississippi
BannedRule 8.4(A), (B)
Game and furbearing animals are defined as the following: white-tailed deer, black bear, gray squirrel, fox squirrel, cottontail rabbit, swamp rabbit, raccoon, opossum, bobcat, river otter, muskrat, mink, and weasel. B. Possession of live game and furbearing animals is prohibited with the following exceptions
The raccoon is named in Rule 8.4's closed list of game and furbearing animals, and possessing one alive is prohibited. The exceptions are public zoos, veterinarians treating a sick animal, someone taking an injured animal to care, and permitted deer enclosures and fox, coyote and rabbit pens; none is a pet. Rule 8.4(C) has animals found in violation confiscated.
How this rule works: Defines game and furbearing animals as a closed list (white-tailed deer, black bear, gray and fox squirrels, two rabbits, raccoon, opossum, bobcat, river otter, muskrat, mink, weasel) and prohibits possessing any of them alive, except public zoos, veterinarians, transport to care and permitted enclosures. Amended 10/22/2017. Not on mdwfp.com's rules record page, so read from Cornell LII. Cached as MS-ms-captivity-and-nuisance.txt.
40 Miss. Admin. Code Part 2, Rule 8.4, Regulations for Game and Furbearing Animals in Captivity →Montana
BannedMCA §§ 50-23-101(4), 50-23-102
A person may not possess a wild animal unless the person possessed it for at least 6 months prior to January 1, 1982, or it is used in a fur-bearing enterprise, contained in a zoological exhibition in a manner that it may not come in physical contact with members of the public, or acquired by an educational institution for scientific research.
Montana's rabies law defines "wild animal" as "a skunk, fox, raccoon, or bat" and bars possessing one. The exceptions are a fur farm, a zoo exhibit with no public contact and research, none of which is a pet, plus a grandfather clause that ran out in 1982. Because the raccoon is native, the exotic wildlife white list does not reach it; this older Title 50 ban is what does.
Existing owners: Held for at least 6 months before 1 January 1982.
How this rule works: Defines "wild animal" for this part as a skunk, fox, raccoon or bat and bars possessing one except in a fur-bearing enterprise, a zoo exhibit with no public contact, or research, or if held for 6 months before 1 January 1982. Cached as MT-mt-rabies-and-menagerie.txt.
MCA §§ 50-23-101 and 50-23-102, rabies control: prohibition of possession of wild animals →Nevada
BannedNAC 503.110(1)(d)
1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the importation, transportation or possession of the following species of live wildlife or hybrids thereof, including viable embryos or gametes, is prohibited: ... (d) Mammals: ... (11) Raccoon........................................... Procyon lotor
Named by binomial on the prohibited list, so importing, transporting or possessing one is barred, captive bred or not. Permits for prohibited species go only to accredited zoos, universities, scientific institutions, commercial aquaculture and nonprofit educational exhibitors. NAC 503.140(4) preserves county and city ordinances, and Clark County, Las Vegas and Henderson are all stricter than the state.
How this rule works: Two lists: 503.110 prohibits, 503.140 names species that may be possessed, transported, imported and exported without a permit. Nevada counties and cities are frequently stricter than the state, notably Clark County, Henderson and Las Vegas.
Nev. Admin. Code § 503.110 (prohibited species) and § 503.140 (species needing no permit) →New Hampshire
BannedFis 804.05, Table 800.2
Raccoon Procyon lotor 5
The raccoon is in the controlled table with category 5 alone. Permittee category 5 is the exhibitor category, with no category 1 for an individual, so a private keeper cannot be issued a possession permit.
How this rule works: Readopted in full by Document #14558, effective 21 April 2026. Four buckets and a closing rule. Fis 804.02 is the non-controlled possession list, Fis 804.03 the prohibited list, Fis 804.05 with Table 800.2 the controlled table, and Fis 804.04(b) then says "All species not specifically listed under the categories of non-controlled, prohibited, or controlled shall be designated as prohibited." Fis 803 runs the same three-way split for importation against Table 800.1. The number beside a species in either table is the permittee category from Fis 802.01: 1 is an individual, 5 an exhibitor, so a species marked 5 alone cannot be held privately. Fis 802.05 is the waiver for unlisted species and subsection (c) closes it to categories 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7, which leaves only exhibitors.
New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, Fis 800, Importation and Possession of Wildlife →New Mexico
BannedDirector's Species Importation List, 2023
Mammal | Furbear, small | Procyonidae | Procyon | Raccoon (any type) | IV | State Protected Species
Named in Group IV, any type, and flagged as a state protected species, so the native animal is covered as well as an imported one. Group IV importation is prohibited for the general public and allowed only for scientific study, department approved restoration, zoological display, temporary events, use as a service animal, or by a qualified expert. 19.35.7 NMAC is an importation rule, so it governs bringing the animal into New Mexico rather than keeping one already here.
How this rule works: The roughly 1,300 row table that 19.35.7 NMAC points at and that earlier research could not obtain. Every row gives a family, a scientific name, a common name and a roman numeral group. Group I is semi-domesticated and needs no importation permit. Group II is not known to be invasive or dangerous and needs a permit. Group III presents minimal or manageable concerns and needs a permit with specific provisions attached. Group IV is prohibited to the general public. The list is reached from the download page rather than a direct file URL, and the site needs a User-Agent header.
New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Director's Species Importation List, updated January 2023 →New York
Banned6 NYCRR § 180.1(b)(5), (c); ECL §§ 11-0511, 11-0103(2)(c)
no person shall import, transport, possess, purchase, barter, transfer, sell, offer for sale, exchange, propagate or release or cause to be released within New York State any of the following live native or non-native dangerous animals including those which are captive bred in any of the following orders, families and individual species or subspecies including all subspecies and hybrids thereof: ... (5) Raccoons in the Genus Procyon;
New York reaches the raccoon three ways. 180.1 lists the genus as a dangerous animal "including those which are captive bred", § 11-0511 names the raccoon among animals that need a license to possess at all, and § 11-0103(2)(c) makes it small game, which § 11-0107(2) bars possessing whether taken here or brought in. Licenses under 180.1(c) issue only for scientific, educational, exhibition, zoological or propagation purposes, and the 180.1(d)(2) exemption for this species is for licensed rehabilitators.
How this rule works: New York answers exotic and native animals through two entirely separate mechanisms, and the famous one is the smaller. § 11-0103(6)(e) is a closed "wild animal" list, six clauses long, that § 11-0512 then bars keeping as a pet: primates, Felidae, Canidae, Ursidae, a named set of large constrictors and monitors plus all venomous reptiles, and Crocodylia. It carries two express carve-outs that decide cells on this map, for registered Felis catus hybrids five generations clear of wild parentage and for captive bred fennec foxes. The other mechanism is the one that catches natives, and it is a definition rather than a list: § 11-0103(2)(c) makes native frogs, salamanders, turtles, lizards and snakes SMALL GAME, therefore game, therefore protected wildlife under § 11-0103(6)(c), and § 11-0107(2) bars possessing protected wildlife "whether taken within the state or coming from without the state". The only license, § 11-0515, is for propagation, banding, scientific or exhibition purposes, so there is no pet route behind it.
N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law §§ 11-0103, 11-0107, 11-0511, 11-0512 and 11-0515 →North Dakota
Banned§ 36-01-08.4; NDAC 48.1-09-01-02(5)(a)
A person may not keep a skunk or raccoon in captivity. This section does not apply to a zoo licensed by the animal care program of the animal and plant health inspection service of the United States department of agriculture.
North Dakota bans the raccoon by statute, and the board's rule adds that raccoons "may not be imported into the state for any purpose" and sets out confiscation. The only exception is a USDA-licensed zoo.
How this rule works: The chapter names only three restrictions relevant to pets: skunks and raccoons may not be kept at all, mountain lions and wolves need a tattooed identification number, and the board is to make rules on primates. § 36-01-08.1 says the board may require a license for nontraditional livestock, meaning any wildlife held in confinement. The wording is permissive but the board has used it: see NDAC article 48.1-09 for the three categories and the license, and § 36-01-00.1(3) for a definition of domestic animal that runs only to dogs, cats, horses, cattle, sheep, goats, bison, farmed elk, llamas, alpacas and swine.
North Dakota Century Code Chapter 36-01, Board of Animal Health →New York City
Banned§ 161.01(b)(5)
All Procyonidae: All raccoon (eastern, desert, ring-tailed cat), kinkajou, cacomistle, cat-bear, panda and coatimundi.
The whole family is prohibited and the raccoon is named first. There is no permit for a private keeper, only the zoo, laboratory, veterinary and permitted temporary exhibit settings the section opens with. § 161.01(d) lets the Department consent to an owner removing a seized animal to a jurisdiction where it is not prohibited, which is the only relief in the article.
How this rule works: A city rule that is stricter than any state on this map, and it works in three layers. It opens with a standard rather than a list, deeming a wild animal to be "any animal which is naturally inclined to do harm and capable of inflicting harm upon human beings". It then adds, at (b)(ii), any wildlife protected or endangered under federal, STATE or local law, which imports New York State's protected wildlife scheme into the city wholesale. And it closes with 24 numbered clauses that work mostly by family: all cats other than Felis catus and their hybrids, all dogs other than Canis familiaris, all Mustelidae including the ferret by name, all squirrels, all marsupials, all large rodents, all Boidae, all Pythonidae, all Varanidae, all Iguanidae, all teiidae, all Chelydridae, all venomous spiders including the tarantula by name, and all turtles under four inches. § 161.01(c) is the short answer to what is left: gerbil, hamster, guinea pig, domesticated rabbit, and small birds such as parakeet, parrot, canary and finch.
New York City Health Code § 161.01, Wild and other animals prohibited →Pennsylvania
Banned58 Pa. Code §§ 137.1(a)(4), (10), (11), 137.31(a)
In the family Procyonidae. All species of raccoons.
Named on the Game Commission's prohibited list, and the raccoon is a Pennsylvania native, so both other doors are shut as well: § 137.31(a) bars keeping one taken from the wild here and § 137.1(a)(11) bars one captive bred in another state. The import and transfer permits in § 137.1(d) and (e) go only to menagerie, exotic wildlife, dealer and propagation permittees, and the raccoon is not exotic wildlife under 34 Pa.C.S. § 2961, so no pet route exists.
How this rule works: The Game Commission's actual prohibited list, and the document most Pennsylvania exotic pet questions turn on rather than the § 2961 definition. Eleven categories, of which three matter most here: all Felidae except house cats, the monk parakeet by name, and a catch-all barring possession of any wildlife held in captivity or captive bred in another state or nation.
58 Pa. Code Ch. 137, Game Commission wildlife regulations, § 137.1 importation, possession, sale and release of certain wildlife and § 137.31 possession of live wildlife →Rhode Island
Banned§ 3.17 native mammal list; §§ 3.7(A), (C)
The possession of native mammals is restricted to those institutions identified within § 3.7(C) of this Part, and as exempted per § 3.8 of this Part. Terrestrial mammals considered native either currently or historically to Rhode Island and which possession as pets is prohibited include the following: ... (27) Raccoon (Procyon lotor),
Named on the list of native mammals that may not be kept as pets. The raccoon is also a rabies target species under § 3.6(A)(23). Rhode Island's native definition applies "regardless of where the animal originated", so a captive-bred animal from out of state is no different, and § 3.7(A) separately restricts every carnivore without a licensed rabies vaccine to researchers, USDA exhibitors and AZA facilities.
How this rule works: One of the most species-specific schemes in the country. § 3.6 defines domestic animals, § 3.7 sets general prohibitions, § 3.9 governs permits, and § 3.17 is the long exempt list of animals that need no exotic animal possession permit. Anything not domestic, not native and not on the § 3.17 list needs a permit.
250-RICR-40-05-3, Rules and Regulations Governing the Importation and Possession of Wild Animals →Utah
BannedUtah Admin. Code R58-14-3(2), (3); R657-3b-1(2)
The Agricultural and Wildlife Damage Prevention Board, by authority granted under Title 4, Chapter 23, the Agricultural and Wildlife Damage Prevention Act, declares it unlawful to import, distribute, relocate, or possess a live raccoon (Procyon lotor) or coyote (Canis latrans).
Utah hands the raccoon to its agriculture board rather than to DWR, which is why Table 3b-1 does not list it. The board's rule bars possessing a live raccoon outright, and the one exception is a per-animal variance for "An organization or corporation" holding raccoons for research or exhibition. No individual or pet route exists.
How this rule works: The rule that answers the raccoon in Utah, which Table 3b-1 leaves out because R657-3b-1(2) hands raccoons and coyotes to the Agricultural and Wildlife Damage Prevention Board. Subsection (2) declares it unlawful to import, distribute, relocate or possess a live raccoon or coyote, and (3) allows only an organization or corporation to request a per-animal variance for research or exhibition. Read from Cornell LII because adminrules.utah.gov serves nothing readable by URL; amended effective 23 May 2023.
Utah Admin. Code R58-14-3, raccoons and coyotes (Agricultural and Wildlife Damage Prevention Board) →Virginia
BannedVa. Code § 29.1-521(A)(10); 4VAC15-20-50
To hunt, trap, take, capture, kill, attempt to take, capture, or kill, possess, deliver for transportation, transport, cause to be transported, by any means whatever, receive for transportation or export, or import, at any time or in any manner, any wild bird or wild animal or the carcass or any part thereof, except as specifically permitted by law and only by the manner or means and within the numbers stated.
The raccoon is a Virginia native wild animal. Because it is a Virginia native, it is not a nonnative (exotic) animal, so the permit table at 4VAC15-30-40 is not its rule, even though the table names its family; § 29.1-521(A)(10) is, and it bars possessing a wild animal except as specifically permitted. The one-per-address allowance at 4VAC15-360-10(A) reaches no mammal, and Chapter 290's permits are for exhibits and scientific collection, the reasoning the flying squirrel cell sets out.
How this rule works: Subsection (A)(10) makes it unlawful to possess, transport or import any wild bird or wild animal except as specifically permitted by law.
Va. Code § 29.1-521, unlawful to hunt, trap, possess, sell or transport wild birds and wild animals →Washington
BannedWAC 246-100-197(5)(a), (b)
All persons are prohibited from acquiring, selling, bartering, exchanging, giving, purchasing, distributing, or trapping to retain any bat, skunk, fox, raccoon, or coyote, except a zoological park, animal exhibitor, research facility, or wildlife rehabilitator.
Washington's answer for the raccoon comes from the Department of Health rather than Fish and Wildlife. The rabies rule bars any person but a zoo, a USDA exhibitor, a research facility or a rehabilitator from acquiring a raccoon by any means, and bars importing one except by those bodies on an entry permit, so a captive-bred animal from another state has no route either.
How this rule works: The rule that answers the rabies-vector carnivores in Washington, and it is a health rule rather than a wildlife one. Subsection (5)(a) bars all persons from acquiring, selling, bartering, exchanging, giving, purchasing, distributing or trapping to retain any bat, skunk, fox, raccoon or coyote, except a zoological park, animal exhibitor, research facility or wildlife rehabilitator, and (5)(b) bars importing one except by those bodies under an entry permit from the Department of Agriculture. "Fox" is unqualified. The rule also defines a canid hybrid, including any animal its owner represents to be a wolf hybrid, and orders a hybrid that bites someone euthanized and tested, but does not bar keeping one.
WAC 246-100-197, Rabies: measures to prevent human disease (Washington State Department of Health) →Florida
Permit required68A-6.002(1)(c); 68A-6.003(8), (13)
Fox, skunks, bats, raccoons, or whitetail deer taken from the wild shall not be possessed as personal use wildlife and shall be possessed only in accordance with permits issued under Rules 68A-9.002, 68A-9.006, F.A.C., or Section 379.3761, F.S.
The raccoon is in neither Class I nor Class II, so it is Class III, and FWC's own personal pet page names the raccoon among common Class III species. That means the no-cost Permit to Possess Class III Wildlife for Personal Use under 68A-6.003(8), and the animal is not on the 22-item no-permit list at 68A-6.003(14). The one bar is 68A-6.003(13): a raccoon taken from the wild may never be a personal pet, so it has to be captive bred.
How this rule works: Florida sorts all wildlife into three classes and then exempts a list from the scheme entirely, and the exemption list is what most pet questions turn on. 68A-6.002 puts 24 taxa in Class I, which 68A-6.003(6) says may not be possessed for personal use at all, and 38 in Class II, which needs a $140 annual permit plus documented experience and caging. Class III is everything else, and 68A-6.003(8) requires a no-cost personal use permit for it. Then 68A-6.003(14) lists 22 categories needing no permit at all, and that list is the answer for most of this map: nonvenomous unprotected reptiles and amphibians, gerbils, hedgehogs, sugar gliders, rabbits, squirrels, ferrets, guinea pigs, hamsters, prairie dogs, chinchillas and parrots among them. Read the class lists without 68A-6.003(14) and Florida looks like a permit state for a bearded dragon. Read (14) without the class lists and it looks like a free-for-all for a capybara.
68A-6.002, 68A-6.003 and 68A-6.004, F.A.C., Captive Wildlife →Illinois
Permit required520 ILCS 5/2.2; 5/3.25
Before any individual shall hold, possess or engage in the breeding or raising of live fur-bearing mammals, he shall first procure a fur-bearing mammal breeder permit. Fur-bearing mammal breeder permits shall be issued by the Department. The annual fee for each fur-bearing mammal breeder permit shall be $25.
The raccoon is named among Illinois's protected fur-bearing mammals in § 2.2 as Procyon lotor, and § 2.2 makes possessing one unlawful except as the Wildlife Code provides. § 3.25 provides it: a fur-bearing mammal breeder permit, $25 a year, required of anyone who holds a live fur-bearer, breeding or not. The protection follows the species, not the animal's origin, so a captive-bred animal from out of state needs it too. Illinois is a home rule state, so a municipal ordinance can be stricter and often decides it.
How this rule works: § 2.2 says the Act applies only to wild birds and wild mammals, then lists the protected species by name and family. Parrots are not among them; the flying squirrel is. § 3.23 (DocName 052000050K3.23) carries the Class A noncommercial breeder permit that lets a private keeper hold a protected species, plus the two named-species clauses that decide the rabbit and the monk parakeet.
Illinois Wildlife Code, 520 ILCS 5 →Indiana
Permit required312 IAC 9-11-7(a)(8); 9-11-2(b)
A permit is required under this rule for the following Class II wild animals: ... (8) Raccoon (Procyon lotor).
A Class II wild animal, so the keeper applies within five days of taking possession, pays ten dollars, passes a conservation officer's cage inspection, shows the animal was lawfully acquired and files a vet's health statement within 45 days. One permit per animal, renewed yearly.
How this rule works: Three classes by risk. Class I is rabbits and squirrels, Class II is a long and specific list of small wild cats plus Indiana's furbearers, Class III is wolves, bears, all other wild cats, venomous reptiles and large crocodilians. Both the Class II and Class III lists end with the same sentence exempting hybrids with a domestic dog or cat, which is the clearest hybrid answer any state gives.
312 IAC 9-11, Wild Animal Possession Permits →Massachusetts
Permit required321 CMR 9.01(1), (12)(a)
The purpose of 321 CMR 9.01 is to list those species which are exempt from the licensing provisions of M.G.L. c. 131, § 23, and which may be imported, possessed, maintained, propagated, bought, sold, exchanged or offered for sale without a license or permit from the Division. Species not listed, or which are expressly listed as "require(s) a permit", are not exempt from the provisions of M.G.L. c. 131, § 23.
The thirteen-entry mammal exemption list has no procyonid, so in this closed-list state the raccoon needs a § 23 license. It is also a Massachusetts native, and the only animals MassWildlife lets a person take from the wild are certain reptiles and amphibians. The license under § 23 exists on paper, but MassWildlife says permits for non-exempt wildlife "are issued only for certain scientific, educational, commercial, or other specific reasons" and "You will not be issued a permit for keeping a wild animal as a pet."
How this rule works: Massachusetts runs a closed white list and says so in terms: a species not on it, or listed as requiring a permit, is not exempt from M.G.L. c. 131, § 23. Two structural points decide most of this state. First, 9.01(2) defines "species" as a "distinct non-domestic VERTEBRATE animal population", and § 23 itself reaches only fish, birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians, so terrestrial invertebrates are outside the scheme entirely. Second, 9.01(3) is a categorical override that most readings of this rule miss: no species may be exempted if it is listed under the federal Endangered Species Act, appears in the IUCN Red Book(s), or is on the Massachusetts endangered, threatened and special concern list at 321 CMR 10.90. Nearly every group listing in 9.01 repeats the cross-reference, so it operates as a live carve-out rather than as drafting furniture, and it is what pulls the Burmese python out of Boidae, the crested gecko out of Gekkonidae and the box turtle out of the turtle allowance.
321 CMR 9.00, Exotic Wildlife: 9.01 Exemption List and 9.02 List of Domestic Animals →Michigan
Permit requiredNREPA Part 427, MCL 324.42701 et seq.
badger, bobcat, red and gray fox, raccoon, coyote, beaver, otter, muskrat, mink, squirrels, striped skunk, woodchuck, opossum, ring-necked pheasant, bobwhite quail, Hungarian partridge, ducks, geese and wild turkeys
The raccoon is on the closed list of game that may be held under the DNR's Permit to Hold Game in Captivity, so a keeper needs that permit. It covers captive-bred animals only, so one taken from the wild cannot be brought under it. Importing one needs an MDARD certificate of veterinary inspection, and local ordinances may prohibit it.
How this rule works: Michigan's route for keeping a native mammal or game bird, and it is a closed list of species rather than a general exotic pet permit. It authorizes captive-bred animals only, so a wild-caught animal cannot be brought under it. Non-native species are outside it entirely, which is why a native red fox needs this permit and a fennec fox does not.
Michigan DNR Permit to Hold Game in Captivity, under NREPA Part 427, MCL 324.42701 et seq. →Minnesota
Permit required§ 97A.015, subds. 39, 45; § 97A.501, subd. 1; § 97A.401, subd. 3(a)
Except as provided in paragraph (b), special permits may be issued without a fee to take, possess, and transport wild animals as pets and for scientific, educational, rehabilitative, wildlife disease prevention and control, and exhibition purposes. The commissioner shall prescribe the conditions for taking, possessing, transporting, and disposing of the wild animals.
The raccoon is small game under subd. 45, so it is a protected wild animal, and § 97A.501 bars possessing one "unless allowed by the game and fish laws". The game and fish laws allow it through the special permit in § 97A.401 subd. 3, which may be issued free "as pets", on conditions the commissioner sets; the only animal that subdivision rules out is deer. It is a discretionary permit, and the DNR decides whether to issue one. The raccoon is not a regulated animal under § 346.155 and is not on the § 17.351 fur farm list.
How this rule works: Subd. 8, added in 2021, is the pet reptile rule: the commissioner must prescribe conditions and may issue breeder permits, and a snake, lizard or salamander is possessable as a pet if it came from a permitted breeder or was held before 1 August 2021. Subd. 3 is the older, broader route, allowing special permits without a fee to possess wild animals as pets.
Minn. Stat. § 97A.401, Special permits →Missouri
Permit required3 CSR 10-9.420(1); 3 CSR 10-4.110(4); 3 CSR 10-9.110(1)(A); 3 CSR 10-9.223(2)
Wildlife Hobby Permit. Authorizes the holder to purchase, possess, and propagate not more than fifty (50) ring-necked pheasants and bobwhite quail, in the aggregate, for personal use only and not for sale; and to hold in captivity not more than one (1) game mammal purchased from a Missouri wildlife breeder permit holder, except that Class II wildlife, hoofed mammals, and skunks may not be held under this permit.
The raccoon is a Missouri furbearer, which 3 CSR 10-20.805(33) makes a game mammal, and the take-five rule for natives expressly excludes anything listed in 3 CSR 10-4.110(4), which is game mammals and furbearers. What remains is the Wildlife Hobby Permit: one animal, bought from a Missouri wildlife breeder permit holder, held for personal use, never propagated or sold. Live raccoons may not be imported into Missouri under 3 CSR 10-9.223(2), so the animal has to come from a Missouri breeder.
How this rule works: Class I is native Missouri mammals, reptiles and amphibians plus birds native to the continental United States. Class II is the venomous natives, mountain lion, wolf and black bear. Class III is cervids. An animal that is none of these is outside the Wildlife Code entirely.
3 CSR 10-9, Missouri Wildlife Code: Confined Wildlife →Nebraska
Permit required166 NAC 8 §§ 001.01B, 001.01D, 001.02A
001.01B It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to retain any wild birds or wild mammals (as defined in Nebraska revised statute 37-245 and 37-246) in captivity except the following species may be kept under authority of a Captive Wildlife Permit ... Raccoon - (Procyon lotor)
The raccoon is a Nebraska native and on the list of wild mammals that may be kept under a Captive Wildlife Permit, obtained before acquisition. The permit is not for wild-caught animals: § 001.01D bars issuing one for an animal taken from the wild, and § 001.02A requires proof it came from a licensed breeder or permittee.
How this rule works: Nebraska renumbered its Game and Parks regulations: what used to be 163 NAC ch. 4 is now Title 166, and captive wildlife has its own chapter 8 rather than a subsection. Anything on this map citing "163 NAC ch. 4, § 008" is pointing at a title that is now called ADMINISTRATION. Chapter 8 has three operative parts. § 001.01B bars retaining any WILD BIRD or WILD MAMMAL in captivity except a listed set of Nebraska natives under a Captive Wildlife Permit. § 001.07A prohibits six species outright, none of them a pet: the Asian raccoon dog, white-tailed and mule deer, red deer, wild pigs and bighorn or thinhorn sheep. And § 001.08A is a closed importation list, which is what actually answers most exotic mammals here, because they are not wild mammals and so the permit scheme never reaches them. Chapter 10 does the same job for reptiles and amphibians and is limited to species native to Nebraska.
166 Neb. Admin. Code ch. 8, Keeping Wildlife in Captivity, and ch. 10, Nongame Species In Need Of Conservation →New Jersey
Permit requiredN.J.A.C. 7:25-10.5(a), 10.6(a)15, 10.7(a)1, 10.8(a)1
"Individual Hobby" may be issued to persons holding game animals for hobby purposes or as pets;
The raccoon has a trapping season, so it is a game animal and the exotic and nongame rule in subchapter 4 does not reach it. 7:25-10 does: 10.6(a) names Procyon lotor among game animals needing a possession permit, and 10.7(a)1 issues an Individual Hobby permit for pets. The animal must not come from wild stock under 10.8(a)1, so it has to be captive bred. The Division's rabies vector policy also bars importing a raccoon from any state with a rabies variant other than the raccoon variant, even from a breeder.
How this rule works: The rule that answers New Jersey's native furbearers, which subchapter 4 never reaches because it governs only exotic and nongame species and these have trapping seasons. 10.5(a) bars possessing any game animal without a permit, 10.6(a) names the raccoon, striped skunk, red and gray fox, coyote, black bear and bobcat, and 10.7(a)1 offers an Individual Hobby permit "for hobby purposes or as pets". 10.8(a)1 requires the animal not to be of wild origin. 10.10 makes nondomestic dogs, bears and nondomestic cats potentially dangerous, and 10.11(a)6 says they "may not be kept as a household pet except when compelled by the infancy of the animal".
N.J.A.C. 7:25-10, Possession, Propagation, Liberation, Sale and Importation of Game Animals and Game Birds →North Carolina
Permit requiredG.S. §§ 113-129(7a), (7c), (15), (16); 113-272.5(a)
the wild animal or wild bird was not acquired unlawfully or merely as a pet
The raccoon is a North Carolina game animal, and a fur-bearer when trapped, so it is a wild animal under § 113-129(15), and (16) carries the definition to animals of wild species raised or kept in captivity. Holding one alive needs a captivity license, and § 113-272.5(a) tells the Executive Director not to issue it unless the animal "was not acquired unlawfully or merely as a pet", the reasoning the flying squirrel cell rests on.
How this rule works: North Carolina's captivity-license statute, which bars issuing a license for a wild animal acquired merely as a pet.
North Carolina General Statutes § 113-272.5 →Ohio
Permit requiredR.C. 1531.01(W); § 1533.71(A)(2)
"Noncommercial propagating license" permitting the licensee to propagate game birds, game quadrupeds except captive white-tailed deer, reptiles, amphibians, or fur-bearing animals and to hold the animals in captivity. Game birds, game quadrupeds except captive white-tailed deer, reptiles, amphibians, and fur-bearing animals propagated or held in captivity by authority of a noncommercial propagating license are for the licensee's own use and shall not be sold. The fee for such a license is twenty-five dollars per annum.
Ohio names the raccoon as a fur-bearing animal in R.C. 1531.01(W), and § 1533.71(A) requires anyone who wants "to have ... fur-bearing animals in captivity" to hold a license. The noncommercial propagating license is the one written for a keeper: $25 a year, for the licensee's own use, no sales. It is not on the § 935.01 dangerous wild animal list.
How this rule works: Ohio defines wild animals as "mollusks, crustaceans, aquatic insects, fish, reptiles, amphibians, wild birds, wild quadrupeds, and all other wild mammals". The word aquatic in front of insects is the whole answer for a terrestrial invertebrate: a land insect or an arachnid is not a wild animal in Ohio and the Division of Wildlife has nothing to say about it.
Ohio Rev. Code § 1531.01(X), definition of wild animals →Oklahoma
Permit requiredOAC 800:25-25-3(a); 29 O.S. § 7-502(B)(4), (E)
The following wildlife species are exempt from import and export permits, commercial wildlife breeders licenses, noncommercial wildlife breeders licenses and commercial hunting area license requirements
The raccoon is native and not on the 37-entry exemption list, so the import permit and the noncommercial wildlife breeder's license apply, the same answer as the prairie dog and flying squirrel. The statute's possession bar is survivable for a pet: § 7-502(B)(4) exempts legally obtained wildlife from a source other than the wild kept as a pet. A raccoon taken from the wild has no such exemption.
How this rule works: One of the most permissive exemption lists in the country, naming the fennec fox, the sugar glider, the coatimundi, the wallaby and primates individually. Note what the exemptions are from: import and export permits and commercial and noncommercial wildlife breeder licenses, not a ban. Subsection (c) exempts non-indigenous reptiles and amphibians as a class, with a two-limb carve-out for species that could establish here and are injurious under federal rules. Oklahoma's own rules site, rules.ok.gov, returns 403 to this container, so this is read from Cornell LII and cited to the official section.
OAC 800:25-25-3, Exemptions →South Carolina
Permit required§ 50-16-20(A)(1), (B)
a furbearer, a member of the family Cervidae, a nondomestic member of the families Suidae (pigs), Tayassuidae (peccaries), Bovidae (bison, mountain goat, mountain sheep), coyote, bear, or turkey (genus Meleagris). Furbearer includes, but is not limited to, red and gray fox, raccoon, opossum, muskrat, mink, skunk, otter, bobcat, weasel, and beaver;
The raccoon is named as a furbearer, and bringing one into South Carolina or possessing one for release needs a Department of Natural Resources permit. § 50-16-20(B) lets the Department issue the permit only if the animal was taken lawfully where it came from and its possession is not expected to harm the state's wildlife, and § 50-16-60's pet-trade exemption does not list it.
How this rule works: § 50-16-20 requires a permit to bring in certain groups of live wildlife, chiefly furbearers, cervids, pigs, bovids, coyote, bear and turkey. § 50-16-60 then exempts a named list of pet trade animals from even that.
S.C. Code Title 50, Chapter 16, Importation and Possession of Wildlife →Tennessee
Permit requiredTenn. Code Ann. §§ 70-4-403(2), 70-4-401(b), 70-4-404(d)(1)(B); Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1660-01-18-.03(2), (3)(b)
(2) Native species of wildlife are considered to be Class II unless specifically designated otherwise by T.C.A. § 70-4-403 or rules and regulations authorized therein. (3) ... (b) 1. The following species or groups of wildlife are deleted from the existing listing designated by legislation as Class III: (i) All native, nonpoisonous reptiles and amphibians; and (ii) All native, furbearing mammals. 2. All species or groups of wildlife deleted from Class III in part 1. are considered to be Class II wildlife.
The raccoon is a native furbearing mammal, and the commission's rule moves native furbearers out of Class III and into Class II. TWRA says no one may possess a Class II species without the permit, which costs $10 an animal for personal possession, and § 70-4-401(b) requires documentary evidence of the supplier's name and address and the date acquired. The statute's Class III entry for furbearers "raised solely for the sale of fur" covers fur farming, not a pet. Rule .01(3) bars taking one from the wild except as statute, proclamation or rule allows.
How this rule works: The commission's own additions to the statutory classes, the chapter earlier sittings could not read because publications.tnsosfiles.com refuses this container. Cornell LII carries all six rules. Rule .03 is short: (1) adds to Class I only hybrids of two Class I species; (2) makes native species Class II unless designated otherwise; (3) adds waterfowl other than migratory game birds, ostriches, cassowaries, caimans and gavials to Class III and moves native nonpoisonous reptiles and amphibians and native furbearers out of it into Class II; (4) adds the nanday parakeet, the monk parakeet, the African clawed frog and most non-native freshwater aquatic life to Class V; and (5) regulates a hybrid of species from different classes as a member of the least restrictive class involved. No mammal is added to Class I by name. Rule .01(4) requires anyone possessing live wildlife to be able to prove legal ownership. Last amended effective 30 January 2022.
Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1660-01-18, Rules and Regulations of Live Wildlife →Texas
Permit requiredParks & Wild. Code §§ 71.001(1), 71.005(c), 71.010
No person may capture or possess a live fur-bearing animal for any purpose, except as otherwise authorized by this code, unless he has acquired and possesses a fur-bearing animal propagation license.
The raccoon is a fur-bearing animal under § 71.001(1), and § 71.005(c) requires a fur-bearing animal propagation license to possess a live one "for any purpose", so the license is a keeper's license as well as a breeder's; the fee is $50.75. The definition is headed "wild", which is the argument a captive-bred animal is outside it, but the word reads as describing the species rather than the animal's history. Not on the dangerous wild animal list, and fur-bearers are excluded from the nongame caps. Cities and counties may still regulate it.
How this rule works: The definition at § 71.001(1) reads "wild beaver, otter, mink, ring-tailed cat, badger, skunk, raccoon, muskrat, opossum, fox, or nutria", and the bare word "fox" is what makes people read Texas as a fox ban state. It is not one. Chapter 71 and the proclamation at 31 TAC §§ 65.371-65.375 govern taking, trapping, pelts and fur dealing; § 65.375(a)(2) says there are no bag or possession limits for fur-bearing animals; and nothing in either bars keeping one. The series is also headed by "wild", which a captive-bred animal is not.
Tex. Parks & Wild. Code § 71.001 and 31 Tex. Admin. Code §§ 65.371-65.375, fur-bearing animals →Vermont
Permit requiredUnrestricted Wild Animal List, July 2025, and Regulation 881 § 5.2
Species not found on the Restricted, Unrestricted or Domestic species lists are considered Restricted.
The raccoon is on none of Vermont's three lists; the only carnivores on the Domestic list are the dog, the cat and the European ferret, and the Unrestricted list's only carnivores are late-generation cat hybrids. It is also a Vermont native, and 10 V.S.A. § 4709 bars possessing a live wild animal without authorization. Restricted means a permit, and Regulation 881 § 5.2 leaves one open to a private keeper: for purposes other than research and education, the Commissioner shall not issue a permit "unless it has been determined that the wild animal or wildlife proposed to be brought into or possessed in the state does not conflict with the purpose of this regulation". That purpose is protecting wild and domestic animals, agriculture and livestock, and human health and safety, and the determination is the Commissioner's, case by case, with no published standard, so an application can be refused.
How this rule works: The list the whole Vermont answer turns on, and the one earlier research could not obtain. Anything on it may be kept with no permit. Its closing line is the important part: species not found on the Restricted, Unrestricted or Domestic species lists are considered Restricted, which makes Vermont an inverted-list state like Hawaii. Several entries are marked Captive Bred Only, which is a real condition rather than a note. The site refuses automated requests without a User-Agent header.
Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, Unrestricted Wild Animal List, July 2025 →West Virginia
Permit requiredW. Va. Code § 20-1-2, § 20-2-4(a), § 20-2-51
The director may issue a permit to a person to keep and maintain in captivity as a pet, a wild animal or wild bird that has been acquired from a commercial dealer or during the legal open season. The fee therefor shall be $2.
The raccoon is a mammal native to West Virginia and a game animal by name in § 20-1-2, so § 20-2-4(a) bars keeping one in captivity except as the chapter provides. § 20-2-51 is the provision that does: a two dollar pet permit from the director for an animal bought from a commercial dealer or taken in the open season. Being native keeps it off the Dangerous Wild Animal list, which excludes wildlife.
How this rule works: The director may issue a $2 permit to keep in captivity as a pet a wild animal or wild bird acquired from a commercial dealer or during the legal open season.
W. Va. Code § 20-2-51, permit to keep a wild animal or wild bird as a pet →Wisconsin
Permit requiredWis. Stat. §§ 169.04(1)(b), 169.15(1)(b); NR 16.15(1)
The department shall issue a Class B captive wild animal farm license to operate a captive wild animal farm that grosses less than $10,000 in annual sales to any person who files a proper application for the license and who pays the applicable fee.
The raccoon is a native fur-bearing wild animal under § 169.01(14), and the seventeen native animals § 169.04(4)(a) frees from licensing stop at weasels and opossums, so § 169.04(1)(b) requires a license. The one that fits a keeper is the Class B captive wild animal farm license, which the department must issue to any applicant and which NR 16.15(1) applies to hobbyists as well as businesses; it names the species held, and pens must meet NR 16.30 to 16.38. The animal must be legally obtained under § 169.04(1)(a), which a wild-caught kit is not.
How this rule works: § 169.01(37) defines wild animal; § 169.11(1)(a) designates harmful wild animals as cougars, ursidae, wild and feral swine. § 169.04(4)(b) exempts most non-native species from licensing.
Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 169, Captive Wildlife →Arkansas
Conditions applyCode 09.14(A)(1)(i); Addendum R1.03
It is unlawful to possess native wildlife as pets except as follows: ... No more than 6 per household of any combination of the following animals may be possessed as pets: Hand-captured opossum, rabbit, raccoon and squirrel;
Arkansas lets a household keep a raccoon it catches by hand in Arkansas, within a combined limit of six native pets, with no sale and no removal from the state. The other route, a captive-born animal bought from a permitted breeder or imported on a permit under 09.14(B), is closed for the raccoon: Addendum R1.03 says the Commission will not issue breeding, sale or importation permits for it. So the condition is a wild-caught Arkansas raccoon, in the limit.
How this rule works: Code 09.01 makes it unlawful to hold any live wildlife captive unless otherwise specified, and its exceptions include terrestrial invertebrates. Code 09.02 conditions non-native wildlife on sourcing and veterinary certification. Code 09.14 caps native wildlife pets at six per household. Chapter 01.00 supplies the two definitions that decide the rest: WILDLIFE reaches "all other wild animals, regardless of classification", and WILD means "living in a state of nature and not domesticated". Addendum R1.02 closes with "Species not listed in Addenda R1.01, R1.02, or R1.03 are prohibited until evaluated", so absence is a bar rather than a silence.
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Code Book, Chapter 09.00 (Captive Wildlife) and Chapter 01.00 definitions →Iowa
Conditions applyIowa Code §§ 481A.1(20), 481A.38, 481A.61(1), (4)
1. Except as otherwise provided by law, a licensed game breeder whose original stock is obtained from a lawful source may possess any game bird, game animal, or fur-bearing animal, or any of their parts. Possession and use of the game birds, game animals, or fur-bearing animals obtained from a licensed game breeder are lawful.
The raccoon is one of Iowa's named fur-bearing animals, and § 481A.38 bars possessing one except as the chapter provides. The chapter provides two things: a licensed game breeder may hold it, and possession of a fur-bearer "obtained from a licensed game breeder" is lawful. So the condition is the source, an Iowa-licensed game breeder, and § 481A.61(4) bars a breeder from acquiring fur-bearers taken from the wild in Iowa. It is not a dangerous wild animal under chapter 717F.
How this rule works: The native side of Iowa, and the half that 717F never reaches. § 481A.1(36) defines a wild animal as "a wild mammal, bird, fish, amphibian, reptile, or other wildlife found in this state", a geographic qualifier that puts an exotic pet outside the chapter. § 481A.1(21) defines game as a closed list of taxa and (f) is "The Sciuridae: such as gray squirrels and fox squirrels", the family rather than the two examples. § 481A.38 then bars possessing game or protected nongame except as the chapter provides, § 481A.42 makes protected nongame "wild fish, wild birds, wild bats, wild reptiles, and wild amphibians" and no invertebrate, and §§ 481A.60 and 481A.61 are the game breeder license, which is the only route by which a person may possess a live game animal.
Iowa Code §§ 481A.1, 481A.38, 481A.42 and 481A.60 to 481A.61 →Wyoming
Conditions applyCh. 10 §§ 12, 14(b); Wyo. Stat. § 23-1-101(a)(viii)(A)
The following wildlife may be possessed without a permit if captured in the state, but no importation is allowed. ... (b) Mammals declared as pests by W.S. 11-5-101 through W.S. 11-5-119, or animals defined in W.S. 23-1-101 as predatory animals.
The raccoon is a "predatory animal" by statute, which gives it an unusual split. Chapter 10 § 12 bars importing predatory animals, so one from a breeder in another state cannot come in, while § 14(b) lets a person keep one captured in Wyoming with no permit at all.
How this rule works: Two closed lists do the work. Domestic animals and domesticated animals are both defined by enumeration, with the phrase for the purpose of this regulation, only the following animals are considered domestic. Anything on neither list is wildlife, and Section 13(d) leaves it to a permit that may be authorized upon approval.
Wyoming Game and Fish Commission Regulation Chapter 10, Importation and Possession of Live Warm-Blooded Wildlife →Arizona
Conditions applyR12-4-406(F)
All species of the order Carnivora
The restricted live wildlife list takes the whole order Carnivora, so a raccoon needs a special license. None of the R12-4-407 exemptions is a pet route. It is also an Arizona native, and taking one alive from the wild is a separate regime under R12-4-404, R12-4-405 and Commission Order 43 that needs a hunting license.
How this rule works: The operative rule. Restricted live wildlife needs a special license, and the lists run by order and family rather than by species, so the whole of Carnivora is caught while most of the pet reptile trade is not. Two exceptions are written in by name: the genus Atelerix, the pet hedgehogs, and the genus Oryctolagus, which the rule says are not wildlife at all. Two subsections do quiet work: (D) exempts domestic animals, defined at R12-4-401 as a species that does not exist in the wild, and (E) pulls hybrids back in whenever one parent species is on the list. Note that the AZGFD commission rules PDF circulating as Supp. 13-2 is a 2013 edition and predates the Atelerix and Oryctolagus exceptions; read the current text, not that one.
Ariz. Admin. Code R12-4-406, Restricted Live Wildlife →Kansas
UnclearK.A.R. 115-5-2(b); K.S.A. 32-1002(a)(2), (b)
(b) Live furbearers legally taken during a furbearer season may be possessed only through the last day of the season in which taken.
K.S.A. 32-1002(a)(2) bars possessing any wildlife unless a regulation permits it, and the raccoon is a Kansas furbearer. The only regulation that permits a live furbearer is 115-5-2(b), and it lets a Kansas-caught animal be held only to the end of the season it was taken in, so a wild-caught pet is out. What is not settled is a captive-bred animal bought in another state: 32-1002(b) lifts the possession bar for animals "legally taken outside this state", and no Kansas text says whether that reaches one bred in captivity. The handoff records this as the one question Kansas has never closed.
How this rule works: Subsection (b) is the possession rule for a live Kansas furbearer: one legally taken during a furbearer season "may be possessed only through the last day of the season in which taken", which rules out keeping a wild-caught raccoon, fox, skunk or bobcat as a pet. Coyotes alone may be held live without limit in time under (d). Read from Cornell LII, since ksoutdoors.gov is blocked to this container.
K.A.R. 115-5-2, Furbearers and coyotes; possession, disposal, and general provisions →Louisiana
UnclearLAC 76:V.131.D.3; La. R.S. 56:8(92), (151)(a)(iv); LAC 76:V.113.B
ii.A raccoon or skunk that is sick, injured, or orphaned may also be possessed pursuant to the provisions of this Paragraph upon notification to the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries of possession of the wildlife and upon receipt of information regarding rabies vector species and a list of available wildlife rehabilitators.
The raccoon is a "nongame quadruped" by statute, and the only text read that speaks to keeping one is the wildlife rescuer rule: a sick, injured or orphaned raccoon may be held for 90 days on notice to the department, and kept for life only on a special purpose permit after a vet finds it non-releasable, spayed or neutered and microchipped, with use "for the purposes of pet trade" barred. The nongame quadruped breeder and exhibitor licenses are business licenses. No text read either bars or allows keeping a captive-bred raccoon bought as a pet, which is the gap.
How this rule works: D.3 lets an individual hold a sick, injured or orphaned squirrel, opossum, rabbit or chipmunk, and on notice a raccoon or skunk, for up to 90 days, and keep it for life on a special purpose and possession permit once trained and a vet finds it non-releasable. Pet-trade use is barred. Cached as LA-la-fox-and-quadrupeds.txt.
LAC 76:V.131, Wildlife Rehabilitation Program (wildlife rescuer, D.3) →Oregon
UnclearOAR 635-044-0450(3), 0460(1), (4), (6)(a); 0470(4)
Wildlife Exhibitor/Animal Entertainment Industry or Wildlife Sanctuary Permit is required to hold species listed in 635-044-0460 and 635-044-0480.
Oregon's raccoon rule reads two ways. 0460(1) says raccoons in captivity require "a Wildlife Holding or Wildlife Exhibitor/Animal Entertainment Industry or Wildlife Sanctuary Permit", 0460(6)(a) caps a Wildlife Holding Permit at two raccoons, and 0460(4) requires the animal to come from an out-of-state USDA breeder, which reads as a live route for an individual. Against that, 0450(3) says an exhibitor or sanctuary permit is required to hold any 0460 species, 0470 is headed as the grandfathering of raccoons "legally held as pets" on 20 January 2017, and 0460(4)(d) and 0470(4) bar offering a raccoon for sale as a household pet in Oregon under ORS 498.029. A pet raccoon acquired since 2017 sits between those texts. A wild-caught one is barred by 0460(4)(b).
Existing owners: An animal legally held as a pet on 20 January 2017, with a Wildlife Holding Permit applied for by 21 January 2018, may be kept for its life under OAR 635-044-0470. It may not be bred, and may be transferred only to an AZA, exhibitor or sanctuary facility.
How this rule works: The ODFW division that answers Oregon's native carnivores, which neither ORS 609.305 nor division 56 reaches. 0460 requires a Wildlife Holding, Exhibitor/Animal Entertainment Industry or Sanctuary permit for black bears, cougars, bobcats, wolves, raccoons and skunks, sourced from an out-of-state USDA breeder, and 0460(3) confines black bears, cougars, bobcats and wolves acquired after 20 January 2017 to AZA, exhibitor and sanctuary facilities. 0470 grandfathers pets legally held on 20 January 2017 whose owners applied by 21 January 2018. 0460(5) puts the burden of proving a wolf-cross or bobcat-cross is a hybrid on the owner. 0430(1)(a) protects every federally listed species. 0430, 0440, 0450 and 0470 are at the same address with their own rule numbers.
OAR 635-044-0430 to 0470, Protected Wildlife and the Holding of Live Black Bear, Cougar, Bobcat, Wolf, Raccoon and Skunk →For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the raccoon legal guide.
Cite this page
Every entry here is quoted from the statute or regulation it comes from, with the date it was last read against the published text.
How to read this
Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat gray state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.
Even a flat gray is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.
Hatched gray means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.
Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.