Where is the sugar glider legal?

Petaurus breviceps. Restricted in 9 of the 52 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Interactive map

Alabama: no restriction found for sugar gliderAlaska: banned for sugar gliderArizona: no restriction found for sugar gliderArkansas: no restriction found for sugar gliderCalifornia: banned for sugar gliderColorado: no restriction found for sugar gliderConnecticut: no restriction found for sugar gliderDelaware: no restriction found for sugar gliderFlorida: no restriction found for sugar gliderGeorgia: conditions apply for sugar gliderHawaii: banned for sugar gliderIdaho: no restriction found for sugar gliderIllinois: no restriction found for sugar gliderIndiana: no restriction found for sugar gliderIowa: no restriction found for sugar gliderKansas: no restriction found for sugar gliderKentucky: no restriction found for sugar gliderLouisiana: no restriction found for sugar gliderMaine: no restriction found for sugar gliderMaryland: no restriction found for sugar gliderMassachusetts: no restriction found for sugar gliderMichigan: no restriction found for sugar gliderMinnesota: no restriction found for sugar gliderMississippi: no restriction found for sugar gliderMissouri: no restriction found for sugar gliderMontana: no restriction found for sugar gliderNebraska: no restriction found for sugar gliderNevada: no restriction found for sugar gliderNew Hampshire: no restriction found for sugar gliderNew Jersey: permit required for sugar gliderNew Mexico: permit required for sugar gliderNew York: no restriction found for sugar gliderNorth Carolina: no restriction found for sugar gliderNorth Dakota: no restriction found for sugar gliderOhio: no restriction found for sugar gliderOklahoma: no restriction found for sugar gliderOregon: no restriction found for sugar gliderPennsylvania: banned for sugar gliderRhode Island: no restriction found for sugar gliderSouth Carolina: no restriction found for sugar gliderSouth Dakota: no restriction found for sugar gliderTennessee: no restriction found for sugar gliderTexas: no restriction found for sugar gliderUtah: no restriction found for sugar gliderVermont: no restriction found for sugar gliderVirginia: no restriction found for sugar gliderWashington: no restriction found for sugar gliderWest Virginia: no restriction found for sugar gliderWisconsin: no restriction found for sugar gliderWyoming: no restriction found for sugar gliderDistrict of Columbia: banned for sugar glider

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked. The counts include New York City, which has rules separate from the surrounding state and so cannot be shaded on a state map. Listed in full below.

What the colours mean

  • Banned (6)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit required (2)Legal, but you need a permit or license before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions apply (1)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • UnclearThe rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction found (43)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
  • Not checked yetWe have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.

Every restriction on the sugar glider

9 of the 52 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.

Alaska

Banned§ 92.029(a), (c)
The department may not issue a permit for the capture, possession, import, or export of any game animal, including a hybrid of a game animal and a species listed in (b) of this section, for use as a pet

Absent from the clean list, and subsection (c) closes the permit route for anything kept as a pet. This is the trap in Alaska: it is not a list of banned animals, it is a list of allowed ones.

How this rule works: The strictest structure in the country and the clearest. Subsection (a) bars possessing live game without a permit, (b) is a short clean list of species needing no permit, and (c) then removes the escape hatch: the department may not issue a permit for any game animal for use as a pet. So an animal missing from the clean list cannot be kept, permit or not.

5 AAC 92.029, Permit for possessing live game →

California

Banned§ 671(c)(2)(C)
Order Marsupialia-Marsupials or Pouched Animals: All species (W)

How this rule works: § 671(b) defines (D) detrimental and (W) welfare. § 671.1(a) lists permit types; none covers pet keeping. The only possession permit, Animal Care, requires lawful possession in California before January 1992.

California Code of Regulations Title 14 § 671, via CDFW Restricted Species Laws and Regulations Manual →

District of Columbia

Banned

A marsupial, so the 'domesticated rodents and rabbits' category does not reach it.

How this rule works: A closed list and one of the shortest in the country. Subsection (j)(1) bars importing, possessing, displaying, selling, trading or giving as a household pet "any living member of the animal kingdom, including those born or raised in captivity", except seven categories: domestic dogs, domestic cats, domesticated rodents and rabbits, captive-bred common cage birds, non-venomous snakes and fish and turtles, ferrets, and racing pigeons. No lizard, no amphibian and no invertebrate fits any of them. Read from the D.C. Code rather than from a reproduction: the seven categories and their exact wording are what every cell in this jurisdiction turns on.

D.C. Code § 8-1808(j), Prohibited conduct →

Hawaii

Banned§ 150A-6.2(c)
Any animal that is not on the lists of conditionally approved, restricted, or prohibited animals shall be prohibited until the board's review and determination for placement on one of these lists

Petaurus appears on none of the four lists, so the default rule bars it rather than any decision about sugar gliders. The special permits the subsection goes on to describe are for medical or ecological emergencies and for filming, not for pets.

How this rule works: The statute behind the lists. Subsection (c) is the default rule: anything not on the conditionally approved, restricted or prohibited list is prohibited until the board reviews it.

Hawaii Revised Statutes § 150A-6.2, Animal import →

New York City

Banned§ 161.01(b)(17)
No person shall sell or give to another person, possess, harbor, keep, or yard wild or other animals identified in this section ... other than in: (i) a zoological park or aquarium ...; or (ii) a laboratory ...; or (iii) a veterinary hospital ...; or (iv) a temporary exhibit, performance or display that has been issued a permit by the Commissioner. ... For the purposes of this Code, a wild animal is deemed to be any animal which is naturally inclined to do harm and capable of inflicting harm upon human beings and all such animals are hereby prohibited ... Such animals shall also include: (i) any animals specified by the Commissioner in regulations ...; (ii) any native or exotic wildlife whose possession or sale is prohibited because they are designated as protected or endangered pursuant to any federal, state or local law, regulation, or rule; and (iii) any of the following animals:

Caught twice in one clause. It covers "All marsupials" and then lists examples ending "pigmy, sugar and greater glider", so the sugar glider is both inside the class and named. New York State exempts it entirely; the city bans it. § 161.01(d) is worth knowing alongside the prohibition: a prohibited animal may be seized by any authorized city employee, the owner has three business days to request a hearing, and with the Department's written consent the animal may be removed to a jurisdiction where it is not prohibited. That last provision is the closest thing to relief in the article.

How this rule works: A city rule that is stricter than any state on this map, and it works in three layers. It opens with a standard rather than a list, deeming a wild animal to be "any animal which is naturally inclined to do harm and capable of inflicting harm upon human beings". It then adds, at (b)(ii), any wildlife protected or endangered under federal, STATE or local law, which imports New York State's protected wildlife scheme into the city wholesale. And it closes with 24 numbered clauses that work mostly by family: all cats other than Felis catus and their hybrids, all dogs other than Canis familiaris, all Mustelidae including the ferret by name, all squirrels, all marsupials, all large rodents, all Boidae, all Pythonidae, all Varanidae, all Iguanidae, all teiidae, all Chelydridae, all venomous spiders including the tarantula by name, and all turtles under four inches. § 161.01(c) is the short answer to what is left: gerbil, hamster, guinea pig, domesticated rabbit, and small birds such as parakeet, parrot, canary and finch.

New York City Health Code § 161.01, Wild and other animals prohibited →

Pennsylvania

Banned34 Pa.C.S. § 2961
all bears, coyotes, lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, cougars, wolves and any crossbreed of these animals which have similar characteristics in appearance or features

Same agency interpretation as the hedgehog, and the same pending bill covers both. A marsupial has nothing in common with any animal the definition names.

How this rule works: The definition names bears, coyotes, lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, cougars, wolves and their crossbreeds, and none of the animals in this dataset. The entire prohibition rests on four words earlier in the sentence, includes, but is not limited to, which the Game Commission reads as reaching small exotic mammals. That is an agency interpretation of a definition rather than anything a legislature wrote about these species, which is why bills to reverse it keep being introduced.

34 Pa.C.S. § 2961, Game and Wildlife Code, exotic wildlife definition →

New Jersey

Permit requiredN.J.A.C. 7:25-4.5
A permit shall be required for any other exotic mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians, or nongame species not specifically exempted by N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.4.

New Jersey is a closed-list state in the strict sense. 7:25-4.2(a) bars possession of any exotic or nongame species without a permit, 4.4 then names the handful that may be kept without one, and 4.5 sweeps everything else back in. The sugar glider appears on none of the Division's three lists, so it is not exempt under 4.4, not one of the families singled out in 4.3, and not potentially dangerous under 4.8. That leaves 4.5, and the permit it points to is the individual hobby permit at 4.6(a)1, which 4.7 conditions on diet, caging that prevents escape, lawful acquisition, veterinary care and freedom from disease. The Division's own handout tells readers to phone the permits office for anything the lists do not name, which is a fair signal that the catch-all is where these end up rather than an oversight.

How this rule works: NJDEP's own courtesy copy of the whole of N.J.A.C. 7:25. Subchapter 4 starts at 7:25-4.1 and carries the definitions, the permit requirement at 4.2, the three species lists at 4.3, 4.4 and 4.8, the pet bar at 4.9(a)3 and 4.15(b), and the state endangered list at 4.13. The three list PDFs the Division hands out are extracts of this.

N.J.A.C. 7:25 Subchapter 4, Endangered, Nongame and Exotic Wildlife →

New Mexico

Permit requiredDirector's Species Importation List, 2023
Mammal | Marsupial | Petauridae | Petaurus breviceps | Sugar Glider | II

Group II on the Director's list: not known to be invasive or dangerous, but an importation permit is still required before the animal may be brought into New Mexico. Resolved from unclear. One caveat on all of this: 19.35.7 NMAC is an importation rule, its stated scope being persons who desire to bring wildlife species into New Mexico, so it governs getting the animal here rather than keeping one already in the state.

How this rule works: The roughly 1,300 row table that 19.35.7 NMAC points at and that earlier research could not obtain. Every row gives a family, a scientific name, a common name and a roman numeral group. Group I is semi-domesticated and needs no importation permit. Group II is not known to be invasive or dangerous and needs a permit. Group III presents minimal or manageable concerns and needs a permit with specific provisions attached. Group IV is prohibited to the general public. The list is reached from the download page rather than a direct file URL, and the site needs a User-Agent header.

New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Director's Species Importation List, updated January 2023 →

Georgia

Conditions applyR. 391-4-8-.05(1)(a)7
The following wild animals are subject to licensing requirements pursuant to O.C.G.A. Sec. 27-5-4. (a) Mammals ... 3. Order Carnivora (weasels, ferrets, cats, bears, wolves, etc.) - All species, except that European ferret (Mustela putorius furo) may be sold, purchased, exhibited, or held as a pet without a license or permit ... 7. Orders Diprotodontia and Peramelemorphia (Marsupials) - All species except that Petaurus breviceps (sugar glider) may be sold, purchased, exhibited, or held as a pet without a license or permit ... 8. Order Erinaceopmorpha (hedgehogs) - All species ... 10. Order Lagomorpha (Rabbits, hares, etc) - All species ... 16. Order Rodentia (rats, mice, etc.) - All species except Genera Cavia, Chinchilla, Gerbillus, Meriones, Mesocricetus, and species Mus musculus, Rattus rattus, and Rattus norvegicus

The other express pet exception. Marsupials are licensed as two whole orders, and Petaurus breviceps "may be sold, purchased, exhibited, or held as a pet without a license or permit if the owner thereof possesses valid documentation that the animal originated from a source inspected and regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture". The condition is provenance rather than paperwork about the animal: a glider from an unlicensed backyard breeder does not qualify however healthy it is.

How this rule works: Georgia sorts wild animals into three tiers and none of them is a pet tier. Rule .03 prohibits outright, and its only pet-relevant entry is the monk parakeet. Rule .04 is inherently dangerous animals needing a licence AND liability insurance: all Felidae, four canid genera, bears, hyenas, kangaroos, great apes, crocodilians, the venomous snake families and a short list of fish and scorpions. Rule .05 requires a licence, and it works by taxonomic order rather than by species, which is why it is so wide: all Carnivora, all hedgehogs, all lagomorphs, all marsupials, all primates, and all rodents except six named genera. The thing to read before any of it is O.C.G.A. § 27-5-4(b)(1), because it says who a licence is issued to: the wild animal trade and public exhibitors, plus no-cost permits for science, education, a capuchin monkey for a person with a permanent disability, and grass carp for a pond owner. No pet. So an animal on .04 or .05 is not a permit animal for a keeper, it is a no, and the rule proves it by writing express "may be held as a pet without a license" exceptions for exactly two animals, the European ferret and the sugar glider.

Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-4-8, Wild Animals, and O.C.G.A. § 27-5-4 →

For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the sugar glider legal guide.

Past the legal question? See the sugar glider profile.

Cite this page

Every entry here is quoted from the statute or regulation it comes from, with the date it was last read against the published text.

How to read this

Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat grey state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.

Even a flat grey is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.