Where is the sugar glider legal?
Petaurus breviceps. Restricted in 10 of the 49 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.
Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked. The counts include New York City, which has rules separate from the surrounding state and so cannot be shaded on a state map. Listed in full below.
What the colours mean
- Banned (5)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
- Permit required (2)Legal, but you need a permit or licence before the animal arrives.
- Conditions apply (1)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
- Unclear (2)The rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
- No restriction foundNothing in the body of law we read restricts this animal here.
Choose an animal
Every restriction on the sugar glider
10 of the 49 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find.
Alaska
Banned§ 92.029(a), (c)The department may not issue a permit for the capture, possession, import, or export of any game animal, including a hybrid of a game animal and a species listed in (b) of this section, for use as a pet
Absent from the clean list, and subsection (c) closes the permit route for anything kept as a pet. This is the trap in Alaska: it is not a list of banned animals, it is a list of allowed ones.
How this rule works: The strictest structure in the country and the clearest. Subsection (a) bars possessing live game without a permit, (b) is a short clean list of species needing no permit, and (c) then removes the escape hatch: the department may not issue a permit for any game animal for use as a pet. So an animal missing from the clean list cannot be kept, permit or not.
5 AAC 92.029, Permit for possessing live game →California
Banned§ 671(c)(2)(C)Order Marsupialia-Marsupials or Pouched Animals: All species (W)
How this rule works: § 671(b) defines (D) detrimental and (W) welfare. § 671.1(a) lists permit types; none covers pet keeping. The only possession permit, Animal Care, requires lawful possession in California before January 1992.
California Code of Regulations Title 14 § 671, via CDFW Restricted Species Laws and Regulations Manual →District of Columbia
BannedA marsupial, so the 'domesticated rodents and rabbits' category does not reach it.
How this rule works: Closed list. Seven permitted categories; everything else is barred as a household pet.
D.C. Code § 8-1808(j), Prohibited conduct →New York City
BannedAll marsupials, including ... numbat and pigmy, sugar and greater glider.
How this rule works: § 161.01 is the list of animals that may not be kept in the five boroughs. It binds regardless of what New York State allows, which is why the city and the state answer differently for several species.
New York City Health Code Article 161, Animals (NYC Department of Health official PDF) →Pennsylvania
Banned34 Pa.C.S. § 2961all bears, coyotes, lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, cougars, wolves and any crossbreed of these animals which have similar characteristics in appearance or features
Same agency interpretation as the hedgehog, and the same pending bill covers both. A marsupial has nothing in common with any animal the definition names.
How this rule works: The definition names bears, coyotes, lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, cougars, wolves and their crossbreeds, and none of the animals in this dataset. The entire prohibition rests on four words earlier in the sentence, includes, but is not limited to, which the Game Commission reads as reaching small exotic mammals. That is an agency interpretation of a definition rather than anything a legislature wrote about these species, which is why bills to reverse it keep being introduced.
34 Pa.C.S. § 2961, Game and Wildlife Code, exotic wildlife definition →Delaware
Permit requiredThe prohibited list names kangaroos and wallabies but not gliders, so it falls to the general exotic animal permit rather than the ban.
How this rule works: An exotic animal is 'ecologically foreign to Delaware, but allowed for possession, sale, and exhibition if a permit has been issued by the Department', covering live wild mammals, hybrids of wild mammals, and live reptiles not native to the state. A prohibited sublist sits on top, barred to everyone outside parks, zoos, aquariums, museums and research facilities. Administered by the State Veterinarian.
7 Del. Admin. Code 3900, Wildlife, exotic animal provisions →New Jersey
Permit requiredN.J.A.C. 7:25-4.5How this rule works: 4.4 is a closed exempt list; 4.5 requires a permit for 'any other' exotic species not exempted.
N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.4 Exempted Species and 7:25-4.5 Additional Species →Georgia
Conditions applyPetaurus breviceps (sugar glider) may be sold, purchased, exhibited, or held as a pet without a license or permit if the owner thereof possesses valid documentation that the animal originated from a source inspected and regulated by the United States Department of AgricultureGa. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 391-4-8-.05, Wild Animals, License Required →
New Mexico
UnclearGroup assignment unknown; unlisted defaults to Group IV.
How this rule works: Four groups. Group I is semi-domesticated and needs no importation permit; Group IV is 'dangerous, invasive, undesirable, state or federal listed threatened, endangered, a furbearer or any other species of concern' and is barred to the general public, allowed only for scientific study, restoration, zoological display, temporary events, service animals or qualified experts. The operative default: 'Any species of live non-domesticated animal not currently on the species importation list will be designated group IV until such time as another determination is made by the director.' The group assignments themselves live in a separate Director's Species Importation List, roughly 27 pages, which I could not obtain.
N.M. Admin. Code 19.35.7, Importation of Live Non-domesticated Animals, Birds and Fish →Vermont
UnclearSame gap. Secondary sources openly disagree on whether Vermont requires a permit for sugar gliders, which is itself a reason not to assert one.
How this rule works: Closed list. § 4709 bars bringing in, transporting or possessing any live wild bird or animal without authorisation. Reg 881: 'the Commissioner shall not issue a permit for the keeping or possession of any wild animal in captivity, except for bona fide scientific or educational purposes' unless the species is designated domestic, a domestic pet, or unrestricted. The Unrestricted Wild Animals List is maintained separately on the department website and was not obtainable.
Vermont Regulation 881 (12-021 Code Vt. R.), Governing the Importation and Possession of Wild Animals, with 10 V.S.A. § 4709 →For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the sugar glider legal guide.
Past the legal question? See the sugar glider profile.
How to read this
A state with no colour is one where nothing in the law we read restricts that animal. That is not the same as a guarantee: it means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.
Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.
Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.