All animals

Where is the leopard gecko legal?

Eublepharis macularius. Restricted in 1 of the 9 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Interactive map

Alabama: not checked yet for leopard geckoAlaska: not checked yet for leopard geckoArizona: no restriction found for leopard geckoArkansas: not checked yet for leopard geckoCalifornia: no restriction found for leopard geckoColorado: not checked yet for leopard geckoConnecticut: not checked yet for leopard geckoDelaware: no restriction found for leopard geckoFlorida: not checked yet for leopard geckoGeorgia: not checked yet for leopard geckoHawaii: banned for leopard geckoIdaho: not checked yet for leopard geckoIllinois: not checked yet for leopard geckoIndiana: not checked yet for leopard geckoIowa: not checked yet for leopard geckoKansas: not checked yet for leopard geckoKentucky: not checked yet for leopard geckoLouisiana: not checked yet for leopard geckoMaine: not checked yet for leopard geckoMaryland: not checked yet for leopard geckoMassachusetts: not checked yet for leopard geckoMichigan: no restriction found for leopard geckoMinnesota: not checked yet for leopard geckoMississippi: not checked yet for leopard geckoMissouri: not checked yet for leopard geckoMontana: not checked yet for leopard geckoNebraska: not checked yet for leopard geckoNevada: no restriction found for leopard geckoNew Hampshire: not checked yet for leopard geckoNew Jersey: not checked yet for leopard geckoNew Mexico: no restriction found for leopard geckoNew York: not checked yet for leopard geckoNorth Carolina: not checked yet for leopard geckoNorth Dakota: not checked yet for leopard geckoOhio: not checked yet for leopard geckoOklahoma: not checked yet for leopard geckoOregon: not checked yet for leopard geckoPennsylvania: no restriction found for leopard geckoRhode Island: not checked yet for leopard geckoSouth Carolina: not checked yet for leopard geckoSouth Dakota: not checked yet for leopard geckoTennessee: not checked yet for leopard geckoTexas: not checked yet for leopard geckoUtah: not checked yet for leopard geckoVermont: no restriction found for leopard geckoVirginia: not checked yet for leopard geckoWashington: not checked yet for leopard geckoWest Virginia: not checked yet for leopard geckoWisconsin: not checked yet for leopard geckoWyoming: not checked yet for leopard geckoDistrict of Columbia: not checked yet for leopard gecko

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked. 9 of the 51 jurisdictions we cover, the 50 states plus DC, have been read for this animal, so the 42 dotted ones are a gap in our research rather than a finding of no rule.

What the colours mean

  • Banned (1)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit requiredLegal, but you need a permit or licence before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions applyLegal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • UnclearThe rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction found (8)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
  • Not checked yet (42)We have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.

Every restriction on the leopard gecko

1 of the 9 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.

Hawaii

Banned§ 4-71-6.5, Restricted Animal List Part A
Eublepharis macularius gecko, leopard

Part A is headed FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION, so a listed animal has no pet route: a university or a licensed exhibitor can hold one and a private keeper cannot. Named individually in the Gekkonidae block, so there is no argument to be had about genus or family coverage.

How this rule works: Part A animals may be brought in by a university or a licensed exhibitor under permit and may not be kept as pets. Part B, published separately as AR-71RB, is the private and commercial use list and was checked as well: it runs to hoofed stock, giraffes, otters, seals, macropods and three named parrots, and contains none of the animals in this dataset.

Hawaii Administrative Rules § 4-71-6.5, List of Restricted Animals, Part A (research and exhibition) →

Past the legal question? See the leopard gecko profile.

How to read this

Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat grey state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.

Even a flat grey is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.