All animals

Where is the madagascar hissing cockroach legal?

Gromphadorhina portentosa. Restricted in 2 of the 8 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Interactive map

Alabama: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachAlaska: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachArizona: no restriction found for madagascar hissing cockroachArkansas: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachCalifornia: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachColorado: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachConnecticut: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachDelaware: no restriction found for madagascar hissing cockroachFlorida: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachGeorgia: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachHawaii: banned for madagascar hissing cockroachIdaho: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachIllinois: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachIndiana: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachIowa: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachKansas: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachKentucky: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachLouisiana: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachMaine: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachMaryland: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachMassachusetts: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachMichigan: no restriction found for madagascar hissing cockroachMinnesota: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachMississippi: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachMissouri: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachMontana: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachNebraska: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachNevada: no restriction found for madagascar hissing cockroachNew Hampshire: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachNew Jersey: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachNew Mexico: unclear for madagascar hissing cockroachNew York: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachNorth Carolina: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachNorth Dakota: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachOhio: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachOklahoma: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachOregon: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachPennsylvania: no restriction found for madagascar hissing cockroachRhode Island: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachSouth Carolina: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachSouth Dakota: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachTennessee: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachTexas: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachUtah: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachVermont: no restriction found for madagascar hissing cockroachVirginia: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachWashington: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachWest Virginia: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachWisconsin: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachWyoming: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroachDistrict of Columbia: not checked yet for madagascar hissing cockroach

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked. 8 of the 51 jurisdictions we cover, the 50 states plus DC, have been read for this animal, so the 43 dotted ones are a gap in our research rather than a finding of no rule.

What the colours mean

  • Banned (1)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit requiredLegal, but you need a permit or licence before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions applyLegal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • Unclear (1)The rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction found (6)This jurisdiction was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one.
  • Not checked yet (43)We have not read this jurisdiction for this animal. It is not a clean bill of health, it is a gap.

Every restriction on the madagascar hissing cockroach

2 of the 8 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find. Open a row for the wording of the rule and the citation behind it.

Hawaii

Banned§ 4-71-6.5
The introduction into Hawaii of live animals or live non-domestic animals as defined in this chapter is only allowed: (1) For those animals on the list designated as conditionally approved and dated November 28, 2006, or on the list designated as restricted entry, dated September 25, 2018

Hawaii runs an inverted rule, and this is the clause that creates it. Introduction is allowed only for animals on the conditionally approved or restricted lists, so an animal on none of them is barred by default rather than left unregulated. Hawaii's insect entries across all three lists are a short list of named species, the mealworm, the pomace fly, the honey bee, a green bottle blow fly, a parasitic wasp and a few butterflies. The Madagascar hissing cockroach is on none of them, and on an island chain that quarantines insects harder than anywhere else in the country that absence is decisive. Absence from the lists here is a ban, not a gap.

How this rule works: The rule text the three species lists hang off, and the part that explains why Hawaii answers differently from everywhere else. Two things matter. § 4-71-6.5 allows introduction only for animals on the conditionally approved or restricted lists, which is what makes an unlisted animal barred by default rather than unregulated. And § 4-71-2 defines a set of domestic animals, the European rabbit among them, then says that as used in the chapter the word animal means non-domestic animal, so the lists never reach those species at all.

Hawaii Administrative Rules Chapter 4-71, Non-Domestic Animal Import Rules, § 4-71-2 definitions and § 4-71-6.5 permitted introductions →

New Mexico

UnclearDirector's Species Importation List, 2023, and 19.35.7 NMAC
Any species of live non-domesticated animal not currently on the species importation list will be designated group IV until such time as another determination is made by the director.

The Madagascar hissing cockroach is not on the Director's list, and neither is any other terrestrial invertebrate: the roughly 1,300 rows are mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. Read literally the default clause would designate it group IV and bar it, since it is a live non-domesticated animal. Read in context that looks wrong, because the rule is titled importation of live non-domesticated animals, birds and fish, its scope speaks of wildlife species, and its machinery is veterinary inspection certificates and disease testing built for vertebrates. The regulation never uses the word invertebrate. Recorded unclear rather than banned, because the definition arguably reaches the animal and plainly was not written with it in mind.

How this rule works: The roughly 1,300 row table that 19.35.7 NMAC points at and that earlier research could not obtain. Every row gives a family, a scientific name, a common name and a roman numeral group. Group I is semi-domesticated and needs no importation permit. Group II is not known to be invasive or dangerous and needs a permit. Group III presents minimal or manageable concerns and needs a permit with specific provisions attached. Group IV is prohibited to the general public. The list is reached from the download page rather than a direct file URL, and the site needs a User-Agent header.

New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Director's Species Importation List, updated January 2023 →

Past the legal question? See the madagascar hissing cockroach profile.

How to read this

Two of the shades mean very different things and are worth telling apart. A flat grey state was read for this animal and nothing in it restricts one. A dotted state has not been read for this animal at all. Coverage runs from two jurisdictions to fifty-one depending on the species, so on a less-researched animal most of the map is a gap in our work rather than a finding, and it should not be taken as permission.

Even a flat grey is not a guarantee. It means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.