Where is the tiger salamander legal?

Ambystoma tigrinum. Restricted in 5 of the 7 jurisdictions checked. Every entry quotes the rule it comes from.

Alabama: no restriction found for tiger salamanderAlaska: no restriction found for tiger salamanderArizona: no restriction found for tiger salamanderArkansas: no restriction found for tiger salamanderCalifornia: banned for tiger salamanderColorado: no restriction found for tiger salamanderConnecticut: no restriction found for tiger salamanderDelaware: no restriction found for tiger salamanderFlorida: no restriction found for tiger salamanderGeorgia: no restriction found for tiger salamanderHawaii: no restriction found for tiger salamanderIdaho: conditions apply for tiger salamanderIllinois: no restriction found for tiger salamanderIndiana: no restriction found for tiger salamanderIowa: no restriction found for tiger salamanderKansas: no restriction found for tiger salamanderKentucky: no restriction found for tiger salamanderLouisiana: no restriction found for tiger salamanderMaine: no restriction found for tiger salamanderMaryland: no restriction found for tiger salamanderMassachusetts: no restriction found for tiger salamanderMichigan: no restriction found for tiger salamanderMinnesota: no restriction found for tiger salamanderMississippi: no restriction found for tiger salamanderMissouri: permit required for tiger salamanderMontana: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNebraska: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNevada: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNew Hampshire: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNew Jersey: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNew Mexico: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNew York: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNorth Carolina: no restriction found for tiger salamanderNorth Dakota: no restriction found for tiger salamanderOhio: no restriction found for tiger salamanderOklahoma: permit required for tiger salamanderOregon: no restriction found for tiger salamanderPennsylvania: no restriction found for tiger salamanderRhode Island: conditions apply for tiger salamanderSouth Carolina: no restriction found for tiger salamanderSouth Dakota: no restriction found for tiger salamanderTennessee: no restriction found for tiger salamanderTexas: no restriction found for tiger salamanderUtah: no restriction found for tiger salamanderVermont: no restriction found for tiger salamanderVirginia: no restriction found for tiger salamanderWashington: no restriction found for tiger salamanderWest Virginia: no restriction found for tiger salamanderWisconsin: no restriction found for tiger salamanderWyoming: no restriction found for tiger salamanderDistrict of Columbia: no restriction found for tiger salamander

Select a state for the rule behind its colour. Alaska, Hawaii and the District of Columbia are drawn out of position so they can be clicked.

What the colours mean

  • Banned (1)No legal way to keep one, and no permit to apply for.
  • Permit required (2)Legal, but you need a permit or licence before the animal arrives.
  • Conditions apply (2)Legal without a permit only if a stated condition is met, such as a generation, a size or an indoor-only rule.
  • UnclearThe rule genuinely does not resolve for this animal. Ask the agency before relying on it.
  • No restriction foundNothing in the body of law we read restricts this animal here.

Every restriction on the tiger salamander

5 of the 7 jurisdictions checked restrict this animal in some way. The rest had no rule we could find.

California

Banned§ 671(c)(3)(C)(1)
Genus Ambystoma (nonnative tiger salamander group)-(D)

How this rule works: § 671(b) defines (D) detrimental and (W) welfare. § 671.1(a) lists permit types; none covers pet keeping. The only possession permit, Animal Care, requires lawful possession in California before January 1992.

California Code of Regulations Title 14 § 671, via CDFW Restricted Species Laws and Regulations Manual →

Missouri

Permit required3 CSR 10-9.230
those species of mammals... and nonvenomous reptiles and amphibians native to Missouri

Ambystoma tigrinum is native to Missouri, which puts it in Class I rather than outside the Wildlife Code.

How this rule works: Class I is native Missouri mammals, reptiles and amphibians plus birds native to the continental United States. Class II is the venomous natives, mountain lion, wolf and black bear. Class III is cervids. An animal that is none of these is outside the Wildlife Code entirely.

3 CSR 10-9, Missouri Wildlife Code: Confined Wildlife →

Oklahoma

Permit required§ 800:25-25-3(c)
monotypic species and subspecies of reptiles and amphibians not indigenous to Oklahoma are exempt from import and export requirements and commercial and noncommercial wildlife breeder's license

Ambystoma is native to Oklahoma, so the non-indigenous exemption does not reach it.

How this rule works: Navigate to Title 800, Chapter 25, Subchapter 25, Section 800:25-25-3. One of the most permissive exemption lists in the country, and one of the very few that names the fennec fox individually. Note what the exemptions are from: permits and breeder licences, not a ban. An unexempt animal is licensable, not prohibited.

OAC 800:25-25-3, Exemptions →

Idaho

Conditions apply§ 010.06
Privately owned companion animals not intended for research or resale that are not native wildlife captured from the wild in Idaho

Captive bred stock is a conventional pet. Ambystoma mavortium is native to Idaho, so one taken from the wild in the state is wildlife and falls outside the definition.

How this rule works: Section 010.06 defines conventional pets, which sit outside the wildlife permit regime. Unusually explicit: it names ferrets, hedgehogs and sugar gliders in the rule text.

IDAPA 13.01.10, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Rules Governing Importation, Possession, Release, Sale, or Salvage of Wildlife →

Rhode Island

Conditions apply§ 3.7(H)
All persons other than a bona fide researcher, or a licensed pet shops and their transportation agents are prohibited from possessing any species of exotic amphibians unless they are kept indoors as pets in a manner that will prevent their escape or liberation into the wild. Keeping of these animals in any type of outdoor enclosure is prohibited.

Rhode Island's native amphibian list does not include the tiger salamander, so it is an exotic amphibian: keepable, but indoors only, and only a pet shop or researcher may import one.

How this rule works: One of the most species-specific schemes in the country. § 3.6 defines domestic animals, § 3.7 sets general prohibitions, § 3.9 governs permits, and § 3.17 is the long exempt list of animals that need no exotic animal possession permit. Anything not domestic, not native and not on the § 3.17 list needs a permit.

250-RICR-40-05-3, Rules and Regulations Governing the Importation and Possession of Wild Animals →

For the full write-up, including the states that get reported wrongly, read the tiger salamander legal guide.

Past the legal question? See the tiger salamander profile.

How to read this

A state with no colour is one where nothing in the law we read restricts that animal. That is not the same as a guarantee: it means no restriction was found in the specific body of law checked for that state, which is recorded alongside each jurisdiction. Cities and counties regularly ban animals their state allows, and several states say so in their own rules.

Hatched grey means the rule genuinely does not resolve. Usually a definition arguably reaches the animal without naming it, and the honest answer is to ask the agency rather than to guess. Those entries are marked unclear on purpose rather than being rounded to a yes or a no.

Every entry links to the regulation it came from. None of this is legal advice, laws change without much notice, and the agency that issues the permit is always the last word. For the federal layer and how state schemes are structured, see the exotic pet legal hub.